Submitted by nacorom t3_z8ef1p in technology
ukezi t1_iyc98e2 wrote
Reply to comment by byteminer in US judge orders Amazon to ‘cease and desist’ anti-union retaliation by nacorom
My guess is that the current Scotus would say that the federal government hasn't any jurisdiction over labor relations because it's not explicitly in the constitution and declares nlra unconstitutional. For that they would have to reverse NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. but that didn't stop them before.
California and the other blue states will have replacement laws in place the moment the decision comes down and the red states continue their way back into the 1800s.
byteminer t1_iyclgju wrote
This person SCOTUS’s
Objective_Ad_9001 t1_iydcyw6 wrote
This person SCOTUS‘s and fucks
geekynerdynerd t1_iydvnzu wrote
Pretty sure California already has laws covering this issue anyway, it's primarily the "states rights" red states that depend upon the federal government for enforcing regulations that prevent a descent into an ancap dystopia.
ukezi t1_iye5268 wrote
Probably a lot more strict then the federal one.
StabbyPants t1_iyexnf7 wrote
huh, i guess it's time to make the union strikes more aggressive.
ukezi t1_iyf2bm0 wrote
I'm not sure if those states would not use the National Guard against the more aggressive strikes like they did back in the day.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments