Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

clickwir t1_j26w9at wrote

You missed the point of what they said. They were blaming the customer for covering physical items. The physical items are cheap and replaceable.

This person is agreeing with the ruling.

3

Ancillas t1_j26x6cu wrote

Okay, I see what you’re saying. I had assumed that the policy holder assumed their data was covered by their property policy, but I guess that isn’t necessarily true.

To the point you clarified, it would seem irrational to prioritize insuring hardware over data.

Thanks for the clarification.

2