Submitted by Stiven_Crysis t3_10mfwtq in technology
mb2231 t1_j63lgxh wrote
Reply to comment by SpecificAstronaut69 in Intel Posts Largest Loss in Years as PC and Server Nosedives by Stiven_Crysis
I don't know, I never really thought intel's processor naming was that hard to understand....
13 - Generation
7 - Processor SKU/Line (i.e. i7)
00
K/F/S - Unlocked/No Graphics/Special Edition
MaximumPlume t1_j63n5cn wrote
Same. I’m not sure if it’s the blue cool-aid that I’m drinking or what, but their naming schemes aren’t that confusing.
Not to mention each of my builds gets researched as I’m figuring out what components I’ll be using – so I never really had any issues with guaranteeing that everything works once I get all the hardware together.
However if the objective is to head to the store, grab a bunch of parts off the shelf, and have everything just fit together when building at home, then yeah I guess it’s currently not so straightforward.
erosram t1_j64q91u wrote
Actually-Yo-Momma t1_j64ma4k wrote
TV naming conventions was hard for me until i googled “Samsung naming conventions”. Most of this info for any company is one 5 second search away lol
Selkie_Love t1_j63orrj wrote
If only they had that on their website somewhere easy and obvious
mb2231 t1_j63rbx2 wrote
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html
Literally the first result on google when you search 'intel processor naming'.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments