Submitted by Jack-Robert22 t3_10840iy in technology
Comments
midasza t1_j3q69k9 wrote
And we will need to wait for the reviews and benchmarks to see how much slower the "laptop 4080" is compared to the desktop one. With the power budgets in the current range I am guessing this is going to be massively slower.
Berova t1_j3q6w0n wrote
For the 0.0000001%?
EagleEyes_009 t1_j3q7yrm wrote
4090 in a 14". Utter insanity.
[deleted] t1_j3q8mpg wrote
[removed]
Polymorph49 t1_j3qb0td wrote
I look forward to the improvement in technology, but not the exorbitant price tag.
[deleted] t1_j3qj2fj wrote
[removed]
IslandChillin t1_j3qmlfi wrote
I can't even fathom the price they will ask for this
C0rn3j t1_j3rhohv wrote
That's possible because the 4090 is not a 4090.
Mobile 4090 (marked exactly the way as desktop) has 60% less cuda cores, less clock, less memory, less bandwidth…
Ronny_Jotten t1_j3t5tvk wrote
Why do you have to fathom it, it says right there it starts at $1999.
Ronny_Jotten t1_j3t62bb wrote
That's the way it's always been, laptop versions have much less capability, why would they change now?
[deleted] t1_j3u0znj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3q4v5w wrote
[removed]