Submitted by Tooskee t3_10oif8i in technology
lethal_moustache t1_j6glgvi wrote
Reply to comment by ostrichpickle in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
The art isn't invalid. It may, however, infringe copyright and make the artist subject to damages.
ostrichpickle t1_j6gm2fr wrote
Every artist ever... learnt off other artists.. so.....
techimp t1_j6gogaa wrote
While it may be true that new artists learn from the old, there is something intrinsically different in an homage, a cover and a new original work. 2 of those are allowed for artists without restrictions, the last (cover) has specific rules on how the copyright is handled (recording the work is one of those items the band can't do, but in theory a fan could). AI does not distinguish this. It's rough approximation of an answer often has either not enough originality or something in uncanny valley territory or weirdness.
That's what is being debated. It IS a conversation worth having since laws will always on the back foot in regards to tech, privacy and rights.
lethal_moustache t1_j6jh0s2 wrote
An AI is not a real person nor an artist.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments