Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

HothForThoth t1_j5104kb wrote

Yes, the article we are talking about said a money exchanging business, AS OPPOSED to a bank.

a spokesman for the Arizona attorney general said: “Courts have held that customers using money transmitter businesses do not have the same expectation of privacy as traditional banking customers.”

3

fargmania t1_j52z5ww wrote

Well I think the courts need another go at that one. Because I do have the same expectations of privacy when it comes to my money, whether I'm using B of A or Paypal. This is the whole problem with non-bank money transmission companies... they're very poorly regulated.

2