Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

reddig33 t1_j8nrt3t wrote

Bring back the frog!

32

Kalse1229 t1_j8o8axx wrote

Hello my baby, hello my honey…

Although I’m sure the frog would get the service banned in Florida.

14

Tampammm t1_j8ntj8a wrote

They can really distinguish themselves from all the other dime a dozen FAST services, if they fill their channels with a lot of their exclusive WB content.

30

BruceChameleon t1_j8nzdv9 wrote

I imagine a lot of the stuff pulled from HBO Max will find its way here.

10

TheWretchedSpirit t1_j8o0ocd wrote

I believe the original poster was being facetious – a good chunk of the pulled HBO (Max) content has already been sold to Tubi and Roku.

12

BruceChameleon t1_j8o100o wrote

Aw man, here I am being thick AND uninformed

5

Tampammm t1_j8o6jfc wrote

I'm talking more about legacy/proprietary content of Warner Bros. from the 1930s/40s/50s/60s/70s/80s/90s. I'd like to see all that great classical content.

I doubt much of that is in the Tubi deal, it's mostly recent stuff in there.

8

helpmeredditimbored t1_j8nmu18 wrote

I’m sure the CBS affiliate in Charlotte, NC will have something to say about that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WBTV

17

jbaker1225 t1_j8pp26z wrote

That’s just their designated call sign as assigned by the FCC (broadcast TV and radio transmissions east of the Mississippi are assign a W- plus 3-letter call sign, and broadcasters to the west get a K- plus 3 letters sign). Considering this will be an app, it’s not likely a local CBS affiliated will have much grounds for dispute.

2

ECKohns t1_j8nqhi0 wrote

I’ll check it out. I actually enjoy the Free Streaming Services like Tubi and PlutoTV.

15

poorbanker t1_j8pp2bh wrote

Same, I just wish that the ad placement was better.

4

Juan_Kagawa t1_j8ntce1 wrote

We all want the frog back, but they'll 100% fuck it up somehow.

8

bros402 t1_j8q3a34 wrote

are they not bringing back the frog, or was it MeToo'd

3