Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_jdky8ql wrote

FYI, terms like “in-demand” or “engagement” are just made-up buzzwords created by random analytics companies that track meaningless metrics like hashtags, Google searches, likes, etc. Basically everything except actual viewership. News outlets shouldn’t use companies like Parrot Analytics as actual sources for anything.

25

Scotsmania t1_jdmshle wrote

It's probably 90% searches for "How shite is Gotham Knights?" or similar. It's all engagement I suppose.

4

panix199 t1_jdmyuzz wrote

suprisingly it's shite, but not as bad as it looked in the awful trailer. At the moment just watching it to see how bad it is... but got kind of suprised. It's not a 2/10, but a 4.5/10

2

mflynn00 t1_jdnhtnc wrote

Yeah I googled it because I didn't know if it was a cartoon or what... Might watch the first episode to confirm it's shit, who knows

0

AgentElman t1_jdn1eqq wrote

You do realize of course that all words are just made-up.

And that when posts are made about what shows are popular based on actual viewership those posts are downvoted to oblivion because this subreddit hates the shows that are actually popular.

2

[deleted] t1_jdnvor8 wrote

>You do realize of course that all words are just made-up.

Yeah, no shit. Thats not really the “gotcha!” you think it is. That’s also why I specifically called them buzzwords: empty terms that don’t say anything meaningful.

>And that when posts are made about what shows are popular based on actual viewership those posts are downvoted to oblivion because this subreddit hates the shows that are actually popular.

Ok, so?

This show is nowhere near being “actually popular.” The latest episode had 420,000 viewers and fell 31% from its debut episode.

https://tvline.com/2023/03/22/tv-ratings-gotham-knights-episode-2-the-cw/

2