Submitted by MarvelsGrantMan136 t3_z80bc8 in television
djm19 t1_iy96p2w wrote
Nobody pays me to consult on this stuff and they probably have access to a lot more data than I...but I just think Oscars needs to get back more into celebrating the craft its there to celebrate. In years past they showed clips highlighting the amazing performances as they were presenting the nominees, they showed how the scripts looked, they showed sketches for the costuming and set decorating. I love all this crafting and highlighting of what makes movies good.
I am sure it was all cut to reduce run time, but I also just think the people who are going to watch the oscars and those who aren't is decided before the Oscars even airs. So might as well serve those who are into it.
hatramroany t1_iy9fro5 wrote
While they have occasionally skipped acting clips during the telecast they show them more often than not. The other categories are always a crapshoot though. The problem is that Academy doesn’t get the rights to clips outside of the telecast so their official YouTube clips / other channels cut out the interesting snippets that were originally shown.
TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iy9jvx9 wrote
> I just think Oscars needs to get back more into celebrating the craft its there to celebrate.
They need to get someone like Gregg Turkington as the host. He even did "Oscar Doctor" segments earlier this year about how he'd improve the Oscars if he got the chance.
Curleysound t1_iy9ivs5 wrote
You’re totally right. They have allowed themselves to be Persuaded by the tv people, who are only concerned with what the advertisers want.
ILoveRegenHealth t1_iya0csf wrote
> Nobody pays me to consult on this stuff and they probably have access to a lot more data than I...but I just think Oscars needs to get back more into celebrating the craft its there to celebrate. In years past they showed clips highlighting the amazing performances as they were presenting the nominees, they showed how the scripts looked, they showed sketches for the costuming and set decorating. I love all this crafting and highlighting of what makes movies good.
Problem is, they did that and ratings sank. So they tried to tighten it up, ratings sank. I actually do not blame them for experimenting because before the song performances used to get a FULL performance (elaborate song and dance for each one) and that tacked on an extra 20-25 minutes. Now they do a quicker medley of the nominated songs and people are fine with that (if they want to hear more, find the song on Youtube/Spotify). You don't find these things out until you try it.
So I don't mind some experimentation as some of it did stick and was preferred. I at first didn't like that they limited speeches and it used to be as long as you want to talk, but now I see why they did it (I think they get about 1.5-2 minutes). If you let everyone talk as long as you want, the show is easily running overtime to 3.5 hours, which people complained about. I would say, however, the Best Picture winner(s) should get way more time. That is the top prize of the night and they need more than 2 minutes. At least increase it there.
TrueKamilo t1_iyans6n wrote
The ratings have been sinking because people have a lot more choices to entertain themselves today than they did in the past. They simply don't have the captive audience they once had, so the only people still watching the ceremony are the die-hard film buffs who really care.
oldgeek123 t1_iydts1i wrote
Yeah and the segment of die hard film buffs is shrinking as streaming television shows (or "long form" storytelling) has overtaken movies in popularity and quality.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments