Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

urgasmic t1_j697tml wrote

the characters sucked so it was hard to invest in the experiment.

10

Takseen t1_j68vwsh wrote

Its a fun little heist series, solid 3/5 from me.

The problem with the mixed episode order for every viewer is I had no one to compare notes with, so to speak, so that didn't change anything for me.

7

StandardBoah OP t1_j6909wv wrote

Im just going with the time frame order as I dislike going backwards and forwards in time all the time, confuses me. Does the order change for each viewer? That might make it a 3/5 for me.

It's fun but I found the plot relied on conveniences a bit too much for my liking. Like the glasses left in the vault and the ex druggie fbi agent being a galaxy brain,

2

TheQuantumLeaper t1_j696gap wrote

The episode order is randomized per account, with the final episode always being the same. So, if you have four profiles on that one account, you'd all have the same order, but your neighbor with their own account might have a different order than yours.

1

Scotsmania t1_j691b5v wrote

When it first came out it created a buzz with people working out the best order but after that it was just an annoyance.

3

jogoso2014 t1_j68z1bq wrote

I like it.

I’m about 4 episodes in.

I don’t think the gimmick is as groundbreaking as some are saying.

The episodes are written in such a way that it doesn’t matter that much so far for me.

It’s very episodic and so chronology is not that important. Maybe if the heist itself is included in the randomness which would be kind of baller.

They may do this since I’m not finished.

1

Starbuck522 t1_j6945xg wrote

I think the heist was shown as a flashback.

1

AKAkorm t1_j6lfvhj wrote

No they have an entire episode for the heist - it’s the last episode no matter what order you get assigned.

2

Starbuck522 t1_j6mjmxa wrote

Ok, which is after episodes which take place after the hiest. Just semantics though...

1

NewClayburn t1_j697ks8 wrote

As I replied to one of the promotional tweets, I think the gimmick is really interesting and would be perfect if applied to an intriguing and engaging TV show such as 1899.

The show itself was fairly typical/expected, but it was still entertaining and well done. Just your typical cheap TV viewing, like The Recruit or whatever else. I wouldn't say it was bad, but it isn't anything to care about.

Still I think the gimmick has some potential if used on something better and where the story lends itself to randomized telling.

1

sp4r3h t1_j69ssbo wrote

Overall average show, neither amazing nor terrible.

Found it a little too predictable, the big reveals were somewhat obvious for anyone paying attention.

Also found the 'gimmick' somewhat irrelevant, I semi-obsessed over optimum viewing order prior to watching but having now watched it I am of the opinion that it would have hardly mattered.

Each episode was so sanitised and prepped to be able to watch it any order that it somewhat hindered each individual episode.

Overall, cut the nonsense make it a flashback / flash forward heist movie of 2 hours and I'd have given it 6/10.

1

rtseel t1_j6aofai wrote

> Overall average show, neither amazing nor terrible.

How very Netflix of them!

1

AKAkorm t1_j6lg627 wrote

I think they forgot the most important element of a heist - making it fun. The show and characters were not fun at all for most part. I did like the prison episode but that was about it.

1