Submitted by blaspheminCapn t3_10ocbtn in television
orangemaroon25 t1_j6g2nf2 wrote
Reply to comment by MasterPlanPenguin in Three seconds of audio could end up costing Fox $500,000 by blaspheminCapn
But if I'm watching a movie then I know it's not really breaking in to deliver an actual message. The concern would be with live broadcasts. I suppose airing a movie on cable you might have to edit that, but in a theater or on a home edition it shouldn't matter.
I already am desensitized to it because the tornado warnings on the radio use the same sound and the listening area of the radio station is such that I hear warnings for folks three counties away which does not affect me in the slightest.
CptNonsense t1_j6g2xf0 wrote
You realize they show movies on tv, right?
orangemaroon25 t1_j6g3b7e wrote
You realize I mentioned that in my comment, right?
MasterPlanPenguin t1_j6g3f8v wrote
Others may not though. The point remains that it should never be used except for emergencies and as others have pointed out this tone can trigger other things to happen as well which can then in turn create an emergency.
Well obviously not because you still recognise it and know it to be in use for an emergency. You aren’t desensitised. Just because you may not react doesn’t mean you are desensitised. You still know “that’s an emergency”. If it’s being played all the time in movies and tv and such you eventually hit a point where you stop thinking emergency and think “eh just a movie”. Your brain stops recognising it as an emergency sound and as just a sound that’s recognisable but not anything to worry about.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments