Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DorianGuey t1_j7pi6xr wrote

I think her "rule" is unrealistic. You'll be looking at other women in public all the time. Some will be showing cleavage.

If you're on a diet, you'll be looking at ice cream and cookies in stores, in movies, and from people around you.

Glancing at something isn't the same as touching it.

−7

WholeSilent8317 t1_j7q88is wrote

intentionally looking at half naked women isn't the same as seeing a woman in public with cleavage. who you also shouldn't be staring at, whether you're single or not.

34

tiripshtaed t1_j7roooe wrote

Touching something isn’t the same as eating something

2

GsTSaien t1_j7s34el wrote

It is not an unrealistic boundary. It is definitely doable to not thirst online, nothing more difficult than just scrolling past.

OP is a jerk for crossing it.

That said, it is not a boundary I would keep. Not because it isn't doable, any decent person can do it without coming up with shitty loopholes or diet analogies; I don't keep this boundary with my partner because it would make us both less happy.

My partner and I both just comment on it when we see hot people, but we can only do things like that because we respect the other's boundaries in the first place.

−3