Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Darealvvaldeezee t1_j92krsj wrote

Wow, who knows what would have happened if she hadn't had to turn them down?

49

BiggsBounds t1_j92l22v wrote

Wonder why they blacked out her jersey.

−14

cluttersky t1_j92ls4x wrote

The Kansas City Kings (now in Sacramento) drafted Caitlyn Jenner. She was called Bruce Jenner then.

−27

Desolecontra OP t1_j92s47k wrote

Lol. But There’s a reason there is a higher population of women in America and nobody watches the wnba. For genetic reasons, men are better at basketball and more fun to watch playing the sport than women. That’s all. She would’ve been terrible

−64

Castod28183 t1_j92w8qp wrote

>It should be noted that Harris was technically the second woman drafted into the NBA. The first was Denise Long, a phenom in her own right who in 1969 was drafted by the Golden State Warriors straight out of Iowa’s Union-Whitten High School when she was just 19 years old.
>
>A 5-foot-11 forward, Long consistently scored over 100 points in individual high school games and specialized at shooting the deep ball in an era where the 3-point line did not even exist yet. However, NBA Commissioner Walter Kennedy vetoed Long’s selection because the NBA did not allow women or players straight from high school to be drafted.

361

Toorelad t1_j936z7l wrote

Imagine being that kid growing up.

"I could have been the first woman in the NBA, but I gave it all up for you you little bastard, and this is how you repay me?"

"Fine, I'll do the dishes."

"And you'll clean your room!"

205

Landlubber77 t1_j939m9l wrote

She had to have an episiotomy during childbirth, or as she put it, going hard in the taint.

12

Fondren_Richmond t1_j93j4eq wrote

she would have been beaten, like in literal fist fights

−35

temujin64 t1_j93no1a wrote

Exactly. For example, women at the peak age for marathon times would be about as good a man in his late 50s.

She just wouldn't have the stamina, speed and power of even the worst make NBA players.

−5

Fin747 t1_j93ntdr wrote

Thanks for your contribution in reminding us violence against women is still very real in our world. Sometimes it's easy to forget but then rarely we can spot a random guy reminding us that men could in fact beat up women in our world. And today you are that guy, congratulations and thank you so much for your wisdom.

23

Fondren_Richmond t1_j93pgoo wrote

>rarely we can spot a random guy reminding us that men could in fact beat up women in our world. And today you are that guy

It's a reminder that violence between players was very real in NBA games in the '70s, when Harris was drafted; and well into the '80s and early '90s.

−4

Matthew_C1314 t1_j93zr1t wrote

This was during a time when the nba draft had several more rounds than today. Often teams just drafted whoever, because those people would never play. For example Bruce Jenner was drafted even though he hadn’t played since high school. It’s a big reason they dropped it down to 2 rounds. Even in the modern nba, the talent pools is severely diluted after the first 10 picks.

41

Sdog1981 t1_j943yvi wrote

They didn’t allow any high school players back then. Spencer Haywood had to sue the NBA for the right to play. The case Haywood v. National Basketball Association went to the Supreme Court.

128

e_keown t1_j9460xb wrote

I learned about her because her son was a coach at my daughter's junior high last year.

43

TurkeySandwich007 t1_j94cp2t wrote

That’s why I said oh boy, no matter the logic behind your statement I knew it wasn’t gonna be received well.

If you’d said she’d be good in the NBA you’d probably be wrong. If you’d said she’d be bad, you’d be perceived as sexist. There was no way to win here.

29

KingOnixTheThird t1_j94gtrc wrote

She would have gotten demolished if she tried out for an NBA team. No disrespect to her, and her skills, but NBA level men are on a whole different level physically.

At 5 ft 11, she would be too short to play the forward position, something she was known for in women's basketball, which means she would likely have to play a guard, which she likely wasn't quick enough for.

Her only shot to compete with the men was if she developed into a one-dimensional 3 point specialist where her only sole purpose was to get open for catch and shoot 3 pointers. Unfortunately for her at 5 ft 11, it would be harder for her to jump over taller men without getting her shot blocked.

9

armpitchoochoo t1_j94lusz wrote

The first step in being the best anti-sexist that you can be is to accept that you are, in fact, sexist. We all are to some degree, no way we could grow up in a sexist society without absorbing some of it

−8

RoyalSloth t1_j94m62a wrote

I mean saying that genetics is why MBB is “more fun to watch” is just wrong, whether or not something’s fun to someone is mostly due to personal taste and social influences

But I think the overarching reason is just adding stuff that was completely unnecessary to add, like “over half the population is women but no one watches the WNBA!” makes it seem like you wanted to talk about women being weaker than men more than actually answering the question that was asked

3

Igottherunsbad t1_j94t7ry wrote

They really only do two rounds? I mean the NHL is the same way (probably just the top 5 are really worth a shit - though obviously you can get lucky with a later pick that happens to pan out) but they still do 9 rounds I believe

5

Igottherunsbad t1_j94tfcd wrote

Or maybe just move on next time lol. Yeah people like mens basketball more. Personally I find both mens and womens basketball to be boring as shit. Who cares. Either way I want to blow my brains out after 20 seconds of sneakers squeaking.

−6

Igottherunsbad t1_j94tmym wrote

Because you ain’t exactly blowing anyones mind my guy

You’re one of those people that talk just to talk aren’t you? Do you have an inner monologue? (Genuine question as I learned not too long ago that most people don’t actually have inner monologues which actually did blow my mind)

2

Sdog1981 t1_j94txjd wrote

I think it was a misguided way of protecting college basketball. In their view they could protect themselves by picking bad players if they spend more time playing college basketball before their first pro contract.

31

[deleted] t1_j94u6s8 wrote

It's still odd to me that the supreme Court would rule in favor of the player in this case. It would seem companies can make up pretty much any requirements for a position they want as long as it's not discriminatory by law. It's just rather interesting, I wonder if it was a matter of the franchise that drafted him having the ability to set their own requirements.

12

girhen t1_j94yua5 wrote

Seven rounds - first three are most important. And 14 players from 2018s 4th or worse rounds have seen at least 1 game.

It is more of a gamble, but some players actually pan out later than others, and late picks often include Russians who might not even come over.

11

whatweshouldcallyou t1_j95m8gb wrote

She would not have played a second in the NBA.

There is no WNBA player who could make an NBA team. Or a D1 college team. D2 would be questionable.

That's not to say they aren't skilled, great athletes--theu are. But it is a different game and they can not compete against professional male players.

3

drygnfyre t1_j97hrwq wrote

As far as I know, most professional leagues (MLB, NFL, NHL) do not actually ban women from being drafted and playing. I don't even know if the NBA disallows it, even though the WNBA is well established.

2

LargestCriminalFine t1_j98w223 wrote

Why do women complain about being paid less if they're allowed in the NBA ??

2

UncommonHouseSpider t1_j98wtrc wrote

There is a lot of money and power tied to college basketball. It is big business and they were protecting their interests by keeping good players from skipping right into the big leagues. It's not right, but that's what people with money and power do.

1