Some shit just recently happened with Alzheimer's research where the researchers were fudging pictures and results to get what the outcome wanted, and not what was actually true. Fucking capitalism, what're ya gonna do.

There's a series of (pretty long) youtube videos that go into a lot of detail about the whole affair: part 1, part 2, part 3

"The Schön affair has besmirched the peer review process in physics as never before. Why didn't the peer review system catch the discrepancies in his work? A referee in a new field doesn't want to "be the bad guy on the block," says Dutch physicist Teun Klapwijk, so he generally gives the author the benefit of the doubt. But physicists did become irritated after a while, says Klapwijk, "that Schön's flurry of papers continued without increased detail, and with the same sloppiness and inconsistencies."

Some critics hold the journals responsible. The editors of Science and Nature have stoutly defended their review process in interviews with the London Times Higher Education Supplement. Karl Ziemelis, one of Nature's physical science editors, complained of scapegoating, while Donald Kennedy, who edits Science, asserted that "There is little journals can do about detecting scientific misconduct."

 

looks like peer review for experimental physics is a joke