Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DrMcJedi t1_iscd6px wrote

That’s both incredibly generous…and super petty.

43

Funmachine t1_iscehbb wrote

Who are these people and what is the significance of this place?

122

mjb2012 t1_iscepol wrote

The building won't last that long. Eventually it will need to be replaced. That day might come sooner than expected if future fundraising is hindered by the inability to change the name.

8

AspireAgain OP t1_iscf30q wrote

Lincoln Center is New York City's premier performance space, current home to the New York Philharmonic.

David Geffen is a billionaire who made his fortune in entertainment. Fisher was a millionaire who made his fortune in radio electronics, and an amateur violinist.

Fisher's original donation was made to help improve the sound quality at Lincoln Center, and was never quite successful. Geffen's donation funded a more recent renovation which so far seems to achieve the goal.

149

JohnfromMI t1_iscgz7n wrote

Until Geffen’s heirs need some money.

Bobby Axelrod taught me this.

64

TUGrad t1_iscqdky wrote

Honestly, perpetual naming is pretty standard for gifts of this size.

330

spiforever t1_iscqo03 wrote

Is this where they got the storyline on Billions?

0

PM_ur_boobies_pleez t1_iscr13s wrote

I don't know how petty it is. There have been cases where someone donates millions of dollars to a hospital on the condition that the hospital be renamed for that person, followed by someone else donating more money and renaming the hospital after the new donor, and in a short period of time.

46

ElGuano t1_iscrt2x wrote

How is that a donation? It kind of sounds like he bought the naming rights to the hall.

2

OrionAboveMe t1_iscs0ap wrote

How to say my parents didn't pay enough attention to me without saying it.

3

refugefirstmate t1_isct8ju wrote

This sounds like one of the better episodes of "Billions".

11

phdoofus t1_iscu0eb wrote

Well not unless someone gives us $500M and you're dead.

3

mushroom4two t1_isczhqa wrote

I think gifts of charity should not come with stipulations. That makes it at best a contract and at worst a bribe. The one thing it isn't is charity.

Besides, trading bribes for commemorations just isn't what I would consider a "wholly good" gesture. People choose to do that, they don't purchase it.

"Silly Idolater, charity is for good people."

4

Wazzoo1 t1_isd09cl wrote

Avery Fisher was always underwhelming as a concert hall. I've heard good things about the new one. Mainly, my brother, who travels to NYC regularly and always tries to catch a Philharmonic performance.

17

scalectrix t1_isd2lzn wrote

That's not a gift, it's a purchase.

3

DasGanon t1_isd6phe wrote

>Fisher was a millionaire who made his fortune in radio electronics, and an amateur violinist. > >Fisher's original donation was made to help improve the sound quality at Lincoln Center, and was never quite successful.

To clarify the brand Fisher was then bought out a couple of times and was owned by Sanyo and now Panasonic (although it's basically a dead brand)

61

notevilfellow t1_isd7ztv wrote

Let's crowdfund $101 million and name the building after everyone who donates

12

alinearis t1_isddqgp wrote

Having seen a few interviews with David Geffen on music-related documentaries over the years, I can honestly say he seems like someone who goes out of his way to be an asshole and takes pride in it.

29

Dynasuarez-Wrecks t1_isdf88z wrote

Wasn't much of a donation then, was it? He was buying ad space.

0

Proud-Tie557 t1_isdg6qk wrote

Billions addressed pay for a name

−2

Salmol1na t1_isdgob6 wrote

“Thanks for your contributions to society”

2

mordinvan t1_isdgru3 wrote

If a donation comes with a reward, it isn't a donation, it is a market transaction.

2

Chipwich t1_isdhw7s wrote

Reminds me of 'wing donated by anonymous'.

1

Lamacorn t1_isdkuma wrote

Are you trying to say I am a joke?

I am clearly a majestic creature that demands significant respect.

My fluffy white coat.

My rainbow main and tail.

My golden horn.

My slightly flares nostrils and buck teeth.

Your eyes will never feast on something as glorious as me.

65

TheStoryGoesOn t1_isdltbu wrote

So I guess the $100 million donation was really $85 million to Lincoln Center and $15 million as a refund to the prior donor.

18

CO_PC_Parts t1_isdmf53 wrote

It’s like Ralph engelstad and the university of North Dakota. Guy was a whack job nazi sympathizer who donated millions to the school and built them all new sports facilities. All under a $1 lease while he was alive and they couldn’t change the mascot name from the Sioux.

He put so many Sioux logos in the hickey arena it cost the school some stupid amount after he died to remove them all. He also gifted $100M to build the hockey arena with the original total to be $50m to build and then the school would get 50m. Well his construction company built it and ran costs up to basically 100M so the school got nothing extra.

It’s a nice arena though. And so is the Betty (named after his wife) and he built a nice complex in thief river falls for the local high school.

Still a trash human being.

25

RapedByPlushies t1_isdtef2 wrote

It’s a Theseus boat problem though. Let’s say one separates the building into two parts. Which one is still the Geffen Center? Even if it’s the bigger of the two, just separate it again. Pretty soon, the Geffen Center is just one brick.

6

ArrowRobber t1_isdya0b wrote

This is a framework of rich-person-vanity-license plates.

Nothing is in perpetuity no matter how much one pays, guarantee a new generation can get stuff named after them.

2

mm089 t1_ise5r08 wrote

It’s not incredibly generous. His net worth is (rounding down) 7 billion USD. 100 million is thus 1/70th of his wealth, or the equivalent of someone with a net worth of 100,000 USD giving 1500 USD (rounding up). When you also consider that donations are tax-deductible, it becomes clear that this is basically a very rich person changing their amount of wealth by nothing at all. And then somehow being a dick about it.

−5

D3monVolt t1_isedy6n wrote

Neither of these have a good ring to them. If I could choose the name of something, I'd make it memorable either through a weird joke or repetition. "Superb hall", "I paid for this hall", "I am rich. And I make so much money, I esrned the 100 million dollars for this in just one month - hall", "hall hall", "Superb hall"

1

Altaira99 t1_isefluu wrote

I hate this trend so much. Boston Garden, Foxboro Stadium were names with a sense of history. Now Big Friggin' Ego billionaires want to scent mark everything.

9

Just_the_facts_ma_m t1_iserppe wrote

What a colossal waste of money - half a billion dollars spent to improve the sound in a building that features music that appeals to one half of one percent of the richest New Yorkers.

Imagine what that money could have done for the poor of NYC.

0

Longjumping_Owl5740 t1_isesnc6 wrote

I don't know anything about this case in particular, but here's the probable answer.

Legally speaking, he's made the donation "out of the goodness of his heart" expecting nothing in return and they'vr has chosen of their own free will to name the building after him. They aren't technically "obligated" to do so because there's no legally binding agreement. If they changed the name tomorrow, he'd have no recourse to sue or expect his money back. Obviously he gave the money with the understanding that the university agreed to name the building after him, but since they aren't "forced" to do so it still counts as a donation.

Source: I work for a prominent university that handles these sorts of things all the time.

0

lisa_williams_wgbh t1_isesxtc wrote

Was this a plotline in “Billions”? I dimly remember something of the sort.

1

spucci t1_iseua6t wrote

Yeah I dunno. Poor and shitty taste yes but I reserve that term for those that actually helped their war movement. Dude was like 12 when the Nazis were defeated.

7

sterfri99 t1_isfcnlm wrote

Every stadium is now “Corporation Name+Field/Stadium/Arena”: No more names, just sponsors. And it’s still not enough money for the teams, since prices are unreasonable for normal people

3

CO_PC_Parts t1_isgbbs7 wrote

"However, his casino had an unusual private suite, a “war room” stocked with Nazi posters and other memorabilia, as well as a collection of cars used by Hitler, Mussolini, Göring, and Himmler. On at least two occasions, he used the suite to celebrate Hitler’s birthday, complete with German food and a cake decorated with a swastika. "

Source

0

spucci t1_isgg0ks wrote

Yup I'm with ya. He sold all of that and apologized to the Jewish Federation of Las Vegas. He also made these donations through his foundation. It doesn't excuse his behavior but your leaving out relevant parts of his story.

$8.2 million to the College of Southern Nevada Foundation in Las Vegas to improve school's health sciences program (2008)[20]

An initial $5 million to the Boys and Girls Club to build a new facility, this includes a long-term donation plan that has money allotted for scholarship endowment (2008)[21]

$10 million to Bishop Gorman High School to fund a new campus (2003)[21]

North DakotaEdit

$250,000 to Farm Rescue to help farm and ranch families struck by unexpected crises in North Dakota (2018)[22]   

$3 million to Grand Forks' Community Violence Intervention Center benefitting its Safer Tomorrow Road Maps program (2018)

$100 million to the University of North Dakota to build Ralph Engelstad Arena (1998)[23]

$20 million endowment to the University of North Dakota (2007)[17]

Items donatedEdit

Donated General George S. Patton Papers (1918-1944, 1997-1998)[24] and portraits of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices to University of North Dakota valued at nearly $127.5 million[25]

UtahEdit

$6 million to build the Engelstad Shakespeare Theatre in Cedar City, Utah (2016)[26] 

As of 2019, the Engelstad Foundation is run by trustees Betty Engelstad, Kris Engelstad McGarry and Jeffrey M. Cooper.[27

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Engelstad

3

[deleted] t1_ish0syp wrote

I said charities and deals like this are (EDIT: how) the rich put money to work for themselves while avoiding some amount of taxation (paraphrased).

A "tax avoidance scheme" somehow balloons into all these assumptions on your part probably because you're acting in bad faith.

How the fuck anyone can know the breadth of another person's knowledge and extrapolate as far as you have from 2 sentences is beyond me. Ego much?

−1

[deleted] t1_ish2084 wrote

Why carry on with all this nonsense? You can google this yourself if you're so smart.

https://apnews.com/article/business-philanthropy-b8acb10f529ac2dbaff7631021d823c9

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/business/donor-advised-funds-tech-tax.html

https://www.fidelitycharitable.org/guidance/charitable-tax-strategies/reduce-taxable-income.html

Anyone who thinks the rich give away money for free is naive at best, and a shill at worst.

I think it's more that you act the contrarian to feel smart.

0

juaninazio t1_ish6mpe wrote

Trashy as fuck but ok David.

1

Aquahemo t1_ishdvan wrote

Doesn't mean it's not a cliche. There's always some person who says "why don't they spend that money on the poor"? Quite predictable, in fact I was expecting someone to say it in this thread and you did.

1

AspireAgain OP t1_isl13j9 wrote

It’s difficult, you know? I get your point, and I personally would have preferred that $100 million be devoted to Autism research. But, if we never put money, effort and talent into art and creative spaces, what kind of a society will we live in? And there are certainly billions of dollars donated every year by others to help those affected by poverty. There are worse things he could have done with the money, certainly.

1