Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

happydgaf t1_iya8wlv wrote

No one undercoats cars anymore.

−6

Sexy_Squid89 t1_iya93iw wrote

Today I learned that undercoating your vehicle was a thing.

17

heeroguy t1_iya9u03 wrote

undercoating anymore will prob make issues worse,

−8

gastroboi t1_iyacyt3 wrote

I have never heard of such a thing.

0

RedSonGamble t1_iyassp1 wrote

Cars don’t rust as much as they use to. Mainly bc of lighter metals and more rust resistant metals.

People that religiously get their cars washed will hate this post though. I have a decent scratch on my car that goes to the metal. I live in Wisconsin. It’s been two years and it’s finally starting to rust. I should really fix it.

4

adamcoe t1_iyayqj7 wrote

No one except like half of Canada and a giant number of people in northern states, and I assume also large swaths of northern Europe.

But yeah outside of those 200 million-odd people, like no one

8

PeachSnappleOhYeah t1_iyb6yjk wrote

how much does this undercoating cost? asking for a friend with a car barely worth protecting

1

CassusEgo t1_iyb7rpy wrote

I live in a very wet and humid area, undercoat isn't a think here. I think someone just wants to sell you something.

10

NetDork t1_iyb9tcd wrote

I live in south Texas where we have an excess of humid days. Frame rust just doesn't happen here. There are loads of 20-30 year old cars that are falling apart but have solid chassis.

15

AirborneRodent t1_iybheb7 wrote

Too much.

Undercoating for years was synonymous with sleazy car salesmen selling you extra features you didn't need. "Bought the undercoating" was an idiom that meant you got swindled.

It's mostly forgotten today, because the metal and the paint on modern cars are far more rust-resistant than they were 40 years ago.

0

CanadianFooBarMan t1_iybhyt5 wrote

The eternal debate of spring undercoating vs fall undercoating.

IMHO, you only really need to get your car undercoated once every 3-5 years, as undecoating is not meant to be washed off/cleaned, and it doesn't really matter when you get it done as they clean the underside of your car anyway before applying it. What you do want to get every year done is your car rust proofed, where they spray rust proof liquid into the nooks and crannies of your car to push moisture out, and it's debatable when you want to get it done, but usually people do this in the fall because otherwise the weather warms up and that thins the coating a lot.

3

lifelikelifer t1_iybllb6 wrote

Pshhh. This is clearly big undercoat that posted this.

Ron Cadillac says "never get the undercoating!"

And Ron Cadillac IS FREAKING EPIC!

1

kozmonyet t1_iybpamx wrote

Um, no. It's the salt.

Only recently did they start using salt compounds in soaking-wet Washington state...and only recently did undercarriage rust start showing up more than superficially. Magically those both correspond.

Old-school undercoating is a huge nasty problem of itself but that's another debate.

11

LipTrev t1_iybuj8e wrote

This is just plain false.

Places with lots of rain, lots of humidity, and no snow, that are far from salt air do not rust anything like cars that drive on salted roads, or live in a salt air environment.

And those two (salted roads versus salt air) have different rust patterns from each other.

The linked article is a Canadian website. If they lived in the American South they'd know they were lying.

6

LipTrev t1_iybuppw wrote

> I grew up in a small city in the Central Valley of California.

People specifically buy cars from the Central Valley due to them being usually rust free even when they are 20-30 years old. With no undercoating needed other than the usually soundproofing coating.

The coastal regions get salt air.

2

JamesDChambers t1_iybzg4h wrote

Bullshit, its a 60-100% humidity here alot and no salt on roads, but in the morth tgere is salt, all the used cars from up north are rusted, tge ones here take 20 years to.

1

BabyTRexArms t1_iyc8tp9 wrote

Fellow WA state here. I noticed we recently started salting roads and I am pretty pissed about it. It doesn’t help, is bad for the environment and horrible for vehicles. I don’t remember voting for it.

0

VeeKam t1_iyd3o52 wrote

This is just wrong. I live in FL, which is a giant humid swamp. Cars last forever here in terms of avoiding rust, and no one get undercoating.

Same for some other states.

2

BabyTRexArms t1_iydqq2t wrote

In theory, but the drawbacks heavily outweigh the benefits. They oversalt the roads here, and that mixes with meltwater and runs off into all of our water sources. Not to mention how bad it is for pretty much any surface whatsoever lol. I've never benefit from salted roads, sidewalks, anywhere.

0

Ewesmakepoos t1_iye4h4n wrote

I second this. Ireland is much wetter than England but we don't ice our roads like they do and the main issue with imports is rust. Changing the brakes on an English import is a nightmare due to rust where as there's almost no rust on Irish cars

2

Underwritingking t1_iyefjr3 wrote

I live in the UK. I haven't had to get a car undersealed since the first one I bought, back in the 1980s.

1

LukeyLeukocyte t1_iyfawrd wrote

There may be bad side effects, but those roads and sidewalks would be FAR more treacherous without the road salt, no? Do you live in an area where everyone has tire chains? I guess that would make the salt less-needed.

​

I always think about all the damage salt does (especially since my job is to fix parking garages - which get destroyed by road salt) but I always wonder how the heck we could live without it because society would come to a screeching halt when snow hits in my area without it. Would love an alternative but it seems far away.

1