Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MillaRedd t1_j1ojb9p wrote

I couldn’t believe it and looked it up. New Wave Hookers 5 is disgusting. I refuse to watch it for a 7th time today. It’s Christmas.

523

fettermans_goiter t1_j1p0mnm wrote

It’s no Backdoor Sluts 9

99

jlemrond t1_j1p4fei wrote

Honestly, Backdoor Sluts 9 was a bit too derivative of Backdoor Sluts 6. I feel like they aren’t even trying to come up with something new. Instead it’s the same ass recycled content.

57

Shut--Up--Bird t1_j1pxiy9 wrote

I disagree.

Back door sluts 6 was a little too new wave for my taste. But when Back door sluts 9 came out in '83, I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically.

25

sickcat29 t1_j1pl2v4 wrote

Is it the same as "ass recycled 4". Or are you saying that it is ass content? Not to be confused with "ass content 1thru 9"

6

[deleted] t1_j1omhk6 wrote

[deleted]

31

NotARussianAgent t1_j1oqyq0 wrote

90s porn titles just hit different

23

dj3po1 t1_j1qwixf wrote

New Wave is a very 80s term since the term described a whole genre of early 80s music. I was wondering why it was made in the 90s but I see the first one was made in 85. New Wave Hookers had some long legs apparently.

2

barriekansai t1_j1p45ll wrote

But there were so many unanswered questions - they had to keep going!

6

GriffinFlash t1_j1ozyqi wrote

Why did I read this in the Christmas Story Narrator voice?

12

youngmindoldbody t1_j1pj05q wrote

I had no idea they made any sequels to New Wave Hookers. Naturally I don't have the original.

3