Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TheTowerBard t1_jckm0y9 wrote

Is this an article from a news outlet written by a journalist or did they just post this guys resume? It’s a very very odd read.

22

VetMedicUSA t1_jckm9ot wrote

That’s the quality reporting we get from the Stowe Reporter these days.

21

MissJudgeGaming t1_jcl5ek1 wrote

Their office is actually like five vermont papers, im surprised if they even proofread.

13

halfbakedblake t1_jclqrst wrote

I just assume it is AI generated and not proofread.

7

resistreclaim t1_jcmgevi wrote

I would not be surprised

4

DHallFan169 t1_jcyotkz wrote

You're lucky to be reading about this at all. If you actually read the article, you'll see that this story only came to light after a great deal of digging and a refusal to accept the police department and town's refusal to talk about the officer's departure. This officer's departure was not announced and there were no details given regarding it. What you're reading is an impartial look at the officer's track record, not a resume. There will certainly be more to be reported on this story, but you should be thankful that local journalism still exists in your community.

0

TheTowerBard t1_jcma8ch wrote

That’s exactly how this reads to me. It’s just so odd, I genuinely can’t believe a human wrote it.

3

Effinehright t1_jcm8u4c wrote

There’s no slant maybe you’re used to an opinion to help guide you? Seems the writer just used quotes and information that’s available.

−1

TheTowerBard t1_jcma36q wrote

I didn’t say it had a “slant,” I said it was odd. Because it is. It’s super odd. Clearly this guy and the rest of the officers in that department are at odds with each other. That’s something a journalist might ask questions about instead of just acting as a stenographer while using an AI bot to pull info about the guy the rest of the department has an issue with. I’m not sure what “slant” you think I’m accusing the supposed “journalist” of having. It’s just a really really odd article. I’m sorry if me pointing that out triggered your fee fees. Hope you’ll be ok.

4

Effinehright t1_jcmbaw3 wrote

Reread my comment maybe it’s just your comprehension that’s the issue?

−5

TheTowerBard t1_jcmclqo wrote

Yes, I fully understand that you are ok with journalists not doing their job and instead acting more like stenographers producing weird articles that read like they were pulled from an AI chat bot.

And please, own your shit. You came in here spewing your gibberish about a “slant” I was supposedly claiming this journalist has. Yet, it’s an article about cops firing a cop, or pushing him out of the department. This is cop on cop drama my dude, where’s the slant? 🤣

I just want an article written by a human, is that too much to ask?

3

Effinehright t1_jcmdpfs wrote

Youre used to articles with a slant is what I said there’s no edit your comprehension sucks. That’s clear by you doubling down. It’s the facts that’s what news is supposed to be. No editorialized bullshit.

−5

TheTowerBard t1_jcmekhq wrote

We don’t need the guys resume and entire work history to establish the facts of this situation you dingus brain. It’s odd. It’s weird. Sorry I hurt your feelings. Bye now.

3

Effinehright t1_jcmf0w9 wrote

Own it though own that you didn’t comprehend!! Come back…

−6