Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bakerton t1_ivobojy wrote

Just to clarify, I agree the amendment is needed, the waste I was talking about was these anti groups, who must have done SOME polling, seeing a 25-75 split and still chucking good money after bad.

17

eye-brows t1_ivocopa wrote

No, I totally get what you meant. You can chuck millions of dollars at Vermonters, and it's not going to convince Vermonters that "abortion bad". I'm glad these lobbyists are idiots and are wasting their money.

5

[deleted] t1_ivoess4 wrote

[deleted]

5

Electrical-Bed8577 t1_ivqkoib wrote

Interestingly, States I once loved (including Montana) voted against women's health care for pregnancy that is frighteningly unexpected (unhealthy, criminal, non-viable, dangerous) and also voted against care for children born of such strife or danger, even when born of children. Miscarriage also falls into this Healthcare need. I'm glad I won't need to try to find a good lawyer before I try to find a good doctor.

1

mojitz t1_ivol20j wrote

That's what I figured when I first saw the ads, then a poll came out a couple weeks back or whatever showing basically this exact result and I was flabbergasted for the same reason.

1