In your first paragraph, you’re asking logic of the illogical, which is why your search will be probably be fruitless. People obsessed with genitalia under the guise of “protecting the kids” are fucked in the head.

Your second paragraph links at least three separate discussions and advances three off-putting conclusions

1. you seem to hand-wavingly suggest that transition hormones or chemicals would clearly confer an athletic advantage: [citation needed]

2. you suggest someone would transition solely or principally the purpose of competing in a sport. Putting aside how offensive this could be to all concerned, how do you propose to test someone’s authenticity of transition? It’s rhetorical, you’re not qualified, and neither is anyone’s coach or judging official

3. asking a sporting event or organization to dole out fairness on society’s behalf is too much. It’s a helluva corrupt forum.