Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SnortingCoffee OP t1_j9h5nx1 wrote

Reply to comment by Feisty_Law_3321 in Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says by SnortingCoffee

>If it’s not so easy for them to post up somewhere else, they will be more likely to accept help.

Is there any evidence of this approach actually working anywhere? I've seen it suggested a lot--just make being homeless even more awful then no one will choose to do it--but I have yet to see any study show that it's an effective approach.

7

Feisty_Law_3321 t1_j9huio5 wrote

The evidence is in the 1/3 of people at McPherson who finally decided enough was enough.

12

Sluzhbenik t1_j9htwju wrote

It doesn’t get much worse than living in a tent in McPherson Square Park. I would say try a lot of different things. We can’t just let anyone post up anywhere, it makes the whole city more dangerous for everyone. And not to mention the economic impact. Your employer wants to drag employees back to in-person work in their McPherson Square office, as the Mayor wants? Surrounded by drug use and danger? No fucking way.

8

Mad-Dawg t1_j9hx6oh wrote

If the encampment hadn’t been cleared, the number of people in housing would likely be zero. You can’t count housing as the only measure of success here when there’s a stubbornly resistant group refusing help and an entire community’s well being to consider.

4