Brandonjh2 t1_jdjszx2 wrote
Reply to comment by fronthacker in NEW: Massive police presence at former Key Bridge Marriott as county condemns building by 22304_selling
Why? It’s a building from the 1950s that no one wants. Destroy it and let someone else design a unique building that fits the needs of the community.
fronthacker t1_jdk7es8 wrote
I think it's a cool example of mid century or international style architecture. I'm all for new and cool stuff, but I wouldn't start here given lots of other stuff that was built in the 80's, 90'd
Brandonjh2 t1_jdkp1p3 wrote
But what about the people who like 80s style more than mid century? Or what if we focus on buildings providing value to the community instead of trying to get shit to fit peoples architectural preferences?
fronthacker t1_jdmxy1a wrote
I get it, taste is a matter of taste. But it's not an accident that some cities are regarded as more beautiful than others. It comes down to artistic styles, beau arts, French revival, etc, etc. "80's style" what architectural style would that be?
Brandonjh2 t1_jdn25mj wrote
fronthacker t1_jdp70wk wrote
Respectfully, that doesn't answer the question
Brandonjh2 t1_jdpjusg wrote
Architectural style should not matter, buildings serve a purpose for the community. We shouldn’t over complicate the issue by trying to make any city fit anyones criteria of “beautiful”. What would be beautiful is a city that prioritizes the needs of the people over a small minorities design preferences.
fronthacker t1_jds7s5d wrote
I completely disagree. However, you seem to be making a socialist "build for the people" type of argument. And now we're debating economic systems
Brandonjh2 t1_jds9tuh wrote
I know you disagree, you think a shitty building filled with squatters shouldn’t be torn down because you like the look of it. I think that’s dumb
fronthacker t1_jdszlnd wrote
Architecture can be fun to learn about. Lots of cool examples in DC
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments