Submitted by [deleted] t3_123tnlr in washingtondc
[deleted] OP t1_jdylvdr wrote
Reply to comment by Salami2000 in Felon who killed DC cyclist attempts to vacate plea deal. by [deleted]
You seem to genuinely lack the processing power to correctly parse that statute. Good luck in life, friend, and play to your strengths, whatever they may be.
Salami2000 t1_je0jwu6 wrote
Because I'm a glutton for punishment, and because you seem to have convinced 3 other illiterates that what you are saying makes sense, I'll try one more time.
The first part of that statute discusses traditional first degree murder. Only the part I quoted above is about felony murder. The big thing that should clue you in, is that second part starts with "or without any purpose to do so." Anything before that requires intent to kill. Felony murder is specifically about situations where someone did not intend to kill, so the part about intending to kill would not apply.
Only the specific named felonies in the second part can get you to felony murder. The other clue here, is that it would not make sense to say any felony applies, and then name specific felonies. Obviously these must be for separate things. Why do you think they're naming specific felonies?
I am using very small words, this should be easy.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments