Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Calm_Farmer_3061 t1_ivzrr6z wrote

Losing arm rests makes seats more accessible. Sometimes that includes fat people, sometimes disabled folks. It's a bummer that you are prioritizing your own luxury of comfort for everyone else's need of access, I hope you reevaluate your perspective

31

Not_A_Hemsworth OP t1_ivzssik wrote

The handicapped seats are specifically designed for access issues. Don’t be all high and mighty with me. Only people I ever saw struggling to get into an arm chaired seat are Americas largest demographic: the morbidly obese. I’ve even seen blind people have no problems with them!

Like, come on, I’m all for equality of access. But no arm rests can’t be helping that many. Show me some Numbers or a research article before you climb Back up on that pedestal.

−26

Calm_Farmer_3061 t1_ivzuo1u wrote

Do you really think that people who are obese do not deserve accessible seating? Since you asked you can scope out this article on inclusive and accessible rail design at https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2020-07/Inclusive%20and%20Universal%20Accessible%20Design%20Guidelines%20for%20Next%20Gen%20Passenger%20Rail-A.pdf . The ideal situation would be moveable arm rests, but forgoing arm rests when that's not possible makes the seat more accessible.

8

Not_A_Hemsworth OP t1_ivzvci9 wrote

Yea, from what I read of that paper they are saying that arm rests would help the disabled. Albeit, as you said, ones that can move.

So, if you don’t mind, I’d like to go back to being mad at WMATA and not each other.

P.s. nothing against the obese either. And I’m impressed you dig up 150 pages on railroad equality for the disabled so fast. Research skills are on point.

−6

SlippyCliff76 t1_iw0swqd wrote

I miss the warm white fluorescent lighting. Sitting in a 7000 series is like being in a xerox machine.

13

Quiet_Meaning5874 t1_iw0ayyt wrote

I’m still mad they got rid of the letting your balance go negative and don’t have machines that accept cards inside the station if you don’t have enough on your card to exit. Feels like they make everything as unfriendly as possible

11

soccerman55 t1_iw2m6oz wrote

Auto-reload/add value by phone kinda makes that redundant doesn’t it?

1

Quiet_Meaning5874 t1_iw2s4lr wrote

Iont trust them to have any personal info of mine have you seen how they operate 🤣🤷‍♂️😆

2

RecursiveBob t1_ivzx6au wrote

I'm probably the only one, but what I miss is the carpets. Yeah, they were ugly and stained. But if you were standing up, they gave your feet a lot more traction.

8

aj2000gm t1_iw0btsb wrote

Ooh hard pass. I’d much rather have the slightly more slippery floors than the mystery stains.

13

Not_A_Hemsworth OP t1_ivzxseu wrote

Yea! As a guy who commutes with his bike on the metro, I’m also appreciative of the carpet!

−5

manillafolda t1_iw2hh70 wrote

I really liked the side “foot rests” of the older models. Made long rides a little more relaxing

6

Goosehybrid t1_iw2i0o4 wrote

This is my biggest complaint. That and the height of the seat.

1

victoriapedia t1_ivzsify wrote

I feel ya, brother. That was one of the distinctive features of the Metro

3

zoggy2 t1_iw2dhfl wrote

While I kinda liked the armrests, i won't miss the muscle pain when, trying not to sit down too close to a large person my clumsy ass sat on it. Since the post-pandemic trains are much less crowded that hasn't been an issue for a while.

1