Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Nopants_Jedi t1_j9s00io wrote

Well good luck getting the mutton head to stop

13

Flat_Weird_5398 t1_j9s0bs7 wrote

Nuclear tests in general, whether they’re by NK or not, are a radioactive risk.

17

autotldr t1_j9s17j7 wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)


> The group is urging South Korea to offer radiation exposure tests for defectors who had lived near NPunggye-ri, the North's main nuclear site.

> North Korea last tested a nuclear bomb in 2017 - the most powerful of six tests conducted at Punggye-ri.

> "North Korea's rulers have sought to maximise international interest in its nuclear capabilities while avoiding attention on its human rights issues. There is in fact a tendency to view the North Korean nuclear issue solely from a security perspective," said the authors of the TJWG's report.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: North^#1 Korea^#2 tests^#3 radiation^#4 South^#5

2

coreywindom t1_j9s4dtz wrote

I don’t understand small countries like North Korea that want nukes. They have to be willing to sacrifice their country’s future and all if it’s people if they ever want to use them because if they used just one they could pray to whatever god they want and there is nothing that god or anybody else could do that would save them when the US brings down the wrath of god

11

BrandonnnnD t1_j9sli27 wrote

I don't think the world is ought to lecture NK on the dangers of nuclear testing, the west has done so much damage in the past by doing these tests.. I recommend you watch 'the coming war on china' on Netflix, it is ofcourse a bit single sided leaning towards the Chinese, but it still presents important facts.

1

creativename87639 t1_j9u1q3u wrote

Because they’re devastating.

Do you think SK wants to lose Seoul, or China Beijing in a trade for controlling NK? No it’s an uneven and garbage trade off that would cause complete instability in your country.

1