Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AngryCanadian t1_je4tn1h wrote

Cool. Thanks, we know. We sent it to them.

278

ajr901 t1_je56l1i wrote

I think we should send them more. They’re obviously making much more effective use of it then we were.

74

Gicofokami t1_je622z8 wrote

Just wait until they get F-16s.

10

Explorer335 t1_je8xfgj wrote

As much as I would like them to get F-16s, that does not appear possible. The F-16s use modern NATO gear that is too sensitive to risk falling into Russian hands. Hopefully, they can get fighter jets, but it will need to be something different.

1

the8bit t1_je6kgpi wrote

When millennials think of a fighter jet, they probably go to f16 first. Anyway with all the f35 hoopla it felt like mentioning a f16 is a boomer moment, but thankfully Russia out here causing a second golden age.

The f16 is roughly 50 years old now

0

Gicofokami t1_je6o27s wrote

I know, but F-16s are still in active use. Even though I like the F-22 and F-35 more, they'd try to send some F-16s.

3

the8bit t1_je6pbt8 wrote

Oh yeah it was more an aside about how interesting it is for the f16 to be relevant and powerful in a large scale conflict still! When discussing US strategy they are often discarded as obsolete

1

shkarada t1_je6hrl1 wrote

Biden said "no". But maybe French Mirage fighters could be delivered?

−1

DukeOfGeek t1_je6ay51 wrote

And then they made a bunch of YouTube videos so we could watch them lighting off the stuff we sent. Good times.

6

Homers_Harp t1_je6p5rv wrote

Kinda takes care of those “audits” that Russia’s supporters in the US Congress want to make sure the Ukrainians are receiving and using these weapons…

6