Comments
SwearJarCaptain t1_iy7v74y wrote
The findings are based on the views and experiences of 2,866 young people aged above six.
Their responses to an online survey, and those of younger children's parents, in April 2022, were used to assess different aspects of mental health, including:
emotional problems behaviour relationships concentration
The children and young people were then classified by how likely they were to have a mental disorder - unlikely, possible or probable - without being seen or diagnosed by a mental-health specialist
pmmichalowski t1_iy7vr2n wrote
It used to be called "teenagers are moody" and "it's just a phase".
It very well might just be, but maybe now we will be able to help them to grow in better functioning adults.
No_Implement611 t1_iy7wk6h wrote
In my opinion 85% of the world probably has mental issues.
resserus t1_iy7y17q wrote
Social issues that correlate with mental illness have skyrocketed over the last 40 years.
Simply_Beige t1_iy7yf7u wrote
>The findings are based on the views and experiences of 2,866 young people aged above six.
So above 6, and the highest age I saw was 24. Quick math says that's about 160 individuals for each year, assuming an even distribution. Not exactly bad for statistics assuming they actually got a random sample. But honestly it's not great either. For example, one third of my graduating class could have been surveyed to account for all of the 18 year olds.
Meinmyownhead502 t1_iy7z6uh wrote
COVID brought a lot of it forward. But yet countries like the US still don’t see it an issue. Slowly it’s becoming destigmatized. From a male prospective we are still looked at extremely funny if we say we have mental health issues. Same with males who are abused. We should just toughen up.
JackBrightScD t1_iy7zzzl wrote
Good news; they appear to be mostly tiktok, twitter, and reddit users.
Guaranteed-Return t1_iy82ha6 wrote
What? That 12 year old who hasn't reached puberty thinks it is the opposite sex?
CuntWeasel t1_iy82p6u wrote
The problem is that it’s one thing to remove the stigma and allow people to get the treatment they need and a whole different thing to embrace and celebrate it, which is what seems to be happening right now.
CuntWeasel t1_iy837f2 wrote
It hasn’t always been the case. Teens are very hormonal and strong disruptions to their environments can cause a lot of harm. The world isn’t in a great spot right now, society has changed a lot in the past 20 odd years, and young people are being pushed off the rails by this.
It’s easy to shit on them and one might even be able to justify it because to be fair teens aren’t exactly the most pleasant people around to begin with, but in the end there’s a reason why they’re fucked up and the fault isn’t really all theirs.
Robbotlove t1_iy83a3t wrote
as long as companies are making record profits and elected officials are getting their palms greased, nothing will change.
[deleted] t1_iy86k0c wrote
[deleted]
SwearJarCaptain t1_iy8a0l9 wrote
I have an issue with individuals being classified at "probable" without any evaluation by a specialist.
[deleted] t1_iy8e6wj wrote
[deleted]
M0urnfulCriesD00m t1_iy8e8yt wrote
It was probably true before COVID. Mental health is something that we've only recently started taking seriously
Max_Fenig t1_iy8l8zr wrote
Actually, I'm pretty sure I'm the only sane one... the whole rest of the planet is fucked.
BobMcCully t1_iy8t4st wrote
Yeah but no but yeah...
BobMcCully t1_iy8tspf wrote
>It used to be called "teenagers are moody" and "it's just a phase"
that is soooooo unfair!!
Cpt_Folktron t1_iy8vn1t wrote
Guess what?! You might have been joking, but this is not very far off the mark.
There are a few things that need to be understood in order to make this clear.
Neuroses exist on a spectrum (not an on-off switch), and almost everyone exhibits neurotic behavior to some extent. Who exhibits observable neurosis and who does not is decided by the interplay of two factors: psychological resistance to neuroses (stress tolerance, established by both nature and nurture), and the amount of stress a person is dealing with.
So, for example, a person with an extremely high tolerance for stress can still become observably neurotic if placed in a horrific situation. Likewise, a person with a very low tolerance for stress can become apparently normal if placed in an extremely safe situation.
In psychology, the tendency to attribute a person's actions to their internal character rather than the situation they are in is called the primary attribution error. It's the most common mistake.
Almost everyone is crazy if the world is crazy enough to make them that way. But, yeah, there is a good ~15% who are resilient AF.
Mr-Bane-Vader t1_iy8vq3w wrote
They seem proud of it too. Even going as far as to seek out additional mental issues to brag about.
First_Mechanic9140 t1_iy8wvn4 wrote
I'd say 95%.
cantkilltheHotep t1_iy9ekm1 wrote
Well half of 17-19 year olds are teen girls so it’s a surprisingly low number.
kquelly78 t1_iy9f2i4 wrote
The “people have always been this depressed, it’s just that now we’re more aware of it” theory doesn’t seem to hold up in my opinion. I’m not a psychologist so take this with a grain of salt, but the mental health epidemic we’re seeing now seems to be caused by social conditions unique to the 21st century.
Automatic-Listen7207 t1_iy9ocs5 wrote
I still to this day get looked at funny and “not as manly” when I tell people I have ADHD, I’m bipolar, my tourettes, OCD, whatever. They don’t believe me when I tell them, and its ESPECIALLY awkward when I talk about my feelings regarding my “conditions” or my feelings about life and its circumstances.
So much fucking stigma.
Automatic-Listen7207 t1_iy9oj1z wrote
Agreed. “I NEED A QUICK FIX TO ALL OF MY PROBLEMS NOW!!! OMG I HAVE ADHD TIKTOK SAID I DO NOW I CAN GET MEDS TO FIX MYSELF!”
Syzygy_Stardust t1_iy9ujgd wrote
I was a little worried about the structure of the study given how shit a lot of social studies are (this coming from someone with a social related degree and still somehow learned statistics), but clicking through and reading the setup of having multiple interviews including an initial in-person one makes me feel a lot better than "an online survey", which would not be representative.
Syzygy_Stardust t1_iy9uqgm wrote
>In psychology, the tendency to attribute a person's actions to their internal character rather than the situation they are in is called the primary attribution error. It's the most common mistake.
It's also the #1 tactic in politics, and coincidentally is the #1 worst thing about politics.
kquelly78 t1_iyaoo9v wrote
That’s not what I was saying at all. The increase in mental health disorders is 100% real and measurable. The people who suffer from these disorders aren’t weak or “faking it”. I’m saying that the lives people live in the modern world CAUSE depression, ADHD, anxiety, etc. People are suffering more and in different ways than they would have a generation or two ago.
Automatic-Listen7207 t1_iyaqpi7 wrote
Oh totally agree with you, I was more or less tailgating off of your post unintentionally I guess.
While I believe there has most certainly been a spike in the amount of people diagnosed with mental health disorders (due to 21st century problems I could whole-heartedly with you there) I also feel that another issue we face in society today is , generally, people want a fix or repair for everything, and FAST (a different take on our modern day problems). Modern technology has spoiled us. I would be hard pressed to find that 100% of these cases are valid, when you may have a teenager/young adult hop into a telemedicine appointment telling the doctor that they cant focus and are having a hard time in school, however what isn’t disclosed is that they’re eating junk food every day and getting 4 hours of sleep. Boom, “ADHD” diagnosis and some meds, neeeeext.
Not trying to argue, totally agree with you, just wanted to express myself.
kquelly78 t1_iyb0j0v wrote
For the record I didn’t mean 100% of cases are valid. I meant that the trend of worsening mental health at the societal level is 100% factual. But yeah I completely agree with everything you said.
ForgingIron t1_iy7v3nk wrote
I wonder if this has always been the case and we've just not had the technology or willpower to detect it until recently