Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

50-Minute-Wait t1_j6hdv9b wrote

Reply to comment by Logical-Dog-7387 in US to renew efforts to reduce India's oil, military 'dependency' on Russia by Falls_stuff

You want Pakistan to have less weapons to use before nukes?

That’s half the point.

The other half is that they keep the military in charge of nukes if something happens.

It’s a shit situation but you’re considered to be the most likely nuclear conflict. Some people think it’s just inevitable.

−30

Logical-Dog-7387 t1_j6hrsbc wrote

So are you going to start a campaign to send weapons to Russia for not using nukes? And these Aids or cost cut on military hardware only strengthened Pakistan military . Them being stronger than their government is one of the reason for instability in the entire region

30

50-Minute-Wait t1_j6ixh3y wrote

>So are you going to start a campaign to send weapons to Russia for not using nukes?

We did. France was looking to modernize Russias fleet. They had the ships in dock getting ready for transfer before canceling.

EU crippled Russias military manufacturing by refusing to sell it replacement part for EU machines. And refusing to sell them components.

Russia is breaking its teeth on a non-nuclear power playing leftovers.

You’re talking about a nuclear nation on your border who you’re in a mini arms race with.

>Them being stronger than their government

Yeah welcome to Middle East. Do you want the rabid dog on a leash or just roaming around?

0

Puzzleheaded_Ebb9874 t1_j6iujie wrote

>You want Pakistan to have less weapons to use before nukes?

Wow such a logical statement. Let's give the Russian more weapons too so that they don't use nukes.

7