Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Lauris024 t1_j6hk9yh wrote

It's absolutely nuts for a modern army to lose 20000 men over some point which isn't even THAT important. Still don't see the problem? Let me put it more clearly - US lost around 7000 men in both, Iraq and Afghanistan war, combined, that lasted many, many years

1

sutrauboju t1_j6hko9b wrote

US has a better army than Russia is your take on this? Amazing insight tbh.

8

[deleted] t1_j6hkwqh wrote

[deleted]

−2

[deleted] t1_j6hlif3 wrote

[deleted]

2

[deleted] t1_j6hmcay wrote

[deleted]

−2

[deleted] t1_j6hncnu wrote

[deleted]

4

[deleted] t1_j6hpx95 wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_j6hr24t wrote

[deleted]

1

bombmk t1_j6k4s0i wrote

Question of what makes something "THAT important" is a little complex though.

What from the outside can be seen as a completely Pyrrhic victory can still work on the inside for someone like Putin that will be under increasing pressure to show success. To just give one example.

It could also boost morale all over the front for Russians troops - the effectively makes the cost worthwhile. (I doubt that, but for the sake of example)

And the Russian army does not operate under the same societal sensitivity to losses that the US does. It is still nuts - but that does not mean it cannot work for an orchish horde.

1