population) and look for highly-upvoted posts about longtermism and ethics, I find things like [this](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/8wWYmHsnqPvQEnapu/getting-on-a-different-train-can-effective-altruism-avoid) and [this](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NFGEgEaLbtyrZ9dX3/scope-sensitive-ethics-capturing-the-core-intuition) and [this](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/T975ydo3mx8onH3iS/ea-is-about-maximization-and-maximization-is-perilous) and [this](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/vZ4kB8gpvkfHLfz8d/critique-of-macaskill-s-is-it-good-to-make-happy-people). There

chance of AGI by 2032](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/QPfzuGYtsC6NTuhmc)

mixed though and it's not obvious how to treat that: see here for example https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bvtAXefTDQgHxc9BR/just-look-at-the-thing-how-the-science-of-consciousness

Here](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zzFbZyGP6iz8jLe9n/agi-ruin-a-list-of-lethalities) is the last missive from the leader I heard about. The emphasis on "pivotal acts" is new to me, this is his latest iteration on the theory that stopping AGI will

forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/LXj4cs5dLqDHwJynp/radical-tactics-can-increase-support-for-more-moderate)