locals had serious concerns about the easement protocols, but the NC sidestepped those nicely, as usual.
[https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article\_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html)
[https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/](https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/)
[https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article\_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html)
Lelabear t1_irit3bg wrote
Reply to comment by Dragonmodus in Great Sand Dunes National Park expands by 9,300 acres by tta2013
locals had serious concerns about the easement protocols, but the NC sidestepped those nicely, as usual. [https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article\_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html) [https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/](https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/) [https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article\_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html)