666vampiric
666vampiric t1_j27jng9 wrote
Reply to When will AI make a movie for me? by NotANumber13
LLM's struggle with both long form content and anything requiring a creative element (and not boring predictable text summary-like behavior). Combining in a multi-media format is 20 years away.
666vampiric t1_j1sm2ma wrote
Reply to Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
I agree that public transport in the US sucks.
But even countries with the best transport in the world Japan, China have mass car use. What do anti-car people propose to seriously end cars for end to end transport?
In the meantime, lets have autonomous cars and save thousands of lives per year, and electric cars to have clean air in cities.
666vampiric t1_j6hex3r wrote
Reply to comment by Primo2000 in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
It's kind of funny how braindead easy it is to create as a product. All you have to do is make a paid API. You can leave the innovative applications to the people who will pay you if you want. But they're so mogged down by AI safety they can't even do that.