Aanar
Aanar t1_j7mlub3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Would the Allies have kept fighting if the axis powers stopped? by Techno-87
Good point. Japan already had Manchuria set up as a puppet for themselves in 1936.
China got a lot of arms sent to them. If Japan hadn't been so ruthless, they probably would haven't been sent so many.
Aanar t1_j7mkny9 wrote
Reply to comment by Doortofreeside in Would the Allies have kept fighting if the axis powers stopped? by Techno-87
I realize it's a game and not the most historically accurate, but I've been trying things in Hearts of Iron IV to help whet my imagination for "what if X did this instead?
If you play Japan, it's hard to put enough pressure on the Soviets if you go into Vladivostok into Siberia. There's just so little infrastructure and supply that there isn't a way to push quickly. A small enough army to not have supply issues, and it can't push. Big enough to push quickly or blitz and you quickly leave your supply lines behind.
There's also not a whole lot there that helps Japan and Japan really is hard pressed for resources, not just oil and rubber, but even just steel. Yes there is oil in Siberia now, but it wasn't discovered/developed in that era.
Rather than Siberia, it works better as Japan to attack the Soviets through Iran and then push into the Caucasus. It gets oil for you and your friends and takes most of the Soviets away, crippling them. Iran itself has a little developed, and the caucuses are the next best source after Texas.
Edit: can't reply since the thread is locked. In response to Masterzig, yeah I should have added attacking Iran only really works as Japan if you do it without getting bogged down in a war with China and stay at peace with Britain as long as possible (since British controlled Pakistan borders Iran). Take Iran, then just wait until Germany launches Barbarosa. You're right you aren't taking on the Soviet army by yourself, but it's enough to tip things toward forcing the Soviets to surrender. I don't see it being very realistic for the Axis and Japanese to cooperate that closely though - they never did IRL.
I don't know what Japan's landing craft capabilties were like. They captured many of China's ports while at war with them, so must have had something. Iran doesn't have much in 1936-1945, so invading Iran is pretty doable. I don't see any situation where Japan would have done that thoguh since they were just focused on thing nearer to them in the Pacific. Iran does have some oil fields though, which Japan really needed. Biggest issue is it's so mountainous it takes a while to get through to the Soviet border and British India/Pakistan is then in between your forces there and Japan. The oil fields Iran does have are enough to get Japan by for a while. And the politics (in the game at least) are such that nobody really cares if you take Iran in 1937.
Aanar t1_iu6a745 wrote
Reply to comment by bitofrock in Astronomers have outlined how the JWST may be able to detect the biosignatures of extraterrestrial life in Earth sized planets orbiting the 15 nearest White Dwarf stars. by lughnasadh
You should see what we name our snowplows here...
Aanar t1_iu68upt wrote
Reply to comment by lughnasadh in Astronomers have outlined how the JWST may be able to detect the biosignatures of extraterrestrial life in Earth sized planets orbiting the 15 nearest White Dwarf stars. by lughnasadh
Wouldn't the orbits of any planets that would be in the habitable zone of a white dwarf had been within the radius of it during it's red giant phase? That would leave only the native planets that somehow migrated inward or where captured from elsewhere.
Aanar t1_iu60z65 wrote
Reply to comment by JokrSmokrMidntTokr in Automakers are going all-in on gaming to keep us in our cars by Test19s
Before cars, your horse knew the way home so you could even get there safely while passed out drunk.
Aanar t1_ir1rheo wrote
Reply to comment by Scytle in Georgia doctor implants one of the first wireless, dual chamber pacemakers: New type of pacemaker is safer option than traditional surgery by universityofga
In the context of the article, it seems like "wireless" is being used to refer to the wired leads and not RF communication.
Aanar t1_ir1nb9k wrote
Reply to comment by GimmickNG in Georgia doctor implants one of the first wireless, dual chamber pacemakers: New type of pacemaker is safer option than traditional surgery by universityofga
They go in different places. This device is actually within your left ventrical. In a traditional pacemaker, only the lead is in the ventrical (and another in the atrium possibly) with the device located in a pocket under the collar bone. Traditional pacemakers are explanted when you need a new one. If the leads are still in good shape, the same leads are used with the new pacemaker, so there's no new net increase of volume of product being placed. If the lead isn't useable, then yes, they typically just put in a new one rather than try to extract the old one since explanting them can be risky. After about 3 or 4 leads though, you run out of room.
Aanar t1_ir1fng2 wrote
Reply to comment by TheTimeIsChow in Georgia doctor implants one of the first wireless, dual chamber pacemakers: New type of pacemaker is safer option than traditional surgery by universityofga
My guess is it's only recommended for older patients? I don't think they can be easily explanted and there isn't room to put a new one in every 12 years over 70+ years.
Aanar t1_j7mmmwl wrote
Reply to comment by iMattist in Would the Allies have kept fighting if the axis powers stopped? by Techno-87
Sure, but there weren't any Soviets knocking on their border either though.