AlecsThorne
AlecsThorne t1_j9uk2ie wrote
Reply to comment by poiyurt in [WP] The knight who saved the princess was a 40 year old man with a wife and kids. He doesn't want her hand he just thinks teenage girls shouldn't be held captive in towers in the middle of nowhere. by Gregamonster
Yeah. We definitely need and want more details 😁
AlecsThorne t1_j9uibkp wrote
Reply to comment by poiyurt in [WP] The knight who saved the princess was a 40 year old man with a wife and kids. He doesn't want her hand he just thinks teenage girls shouldn't be held captive in towers in the middle of nowhere. by Gregamonster
I thought so too. That's why I'm confused by "daughters".
AlecsThorne t1_j9tsxl2 wrote
Reply to comment by Jufilup in [WP] The knight who saved the princess was a 40 year old man with a wife and kids. He doesn't want her hand he just thinks teenage girls shouldn't be held captive in towers in the middle of nowhere. by Gregamonster
Wait.. so the princesses stayed with them? Or why is it 'daughters'? Cause from what I get, they have a son and daughter, Tom and Helen
AlecsThorne t1_j9tsx6j wrote
Reply to comment by Jufilup in [WP] The knight who saved the princess was a 40 year old man with a wife and kids. He doesn't want her hand he just thinks teenage girls shouldn't be held captive in towers in the middle of nowhere. by Gregamonster
Wait.. so the princesses stayed with them? Or why is it 'daughters'? Cause from what I get, they have a son and daughter, Tom and Helen
AlecsThorne t1_j9ukgso wrote
Reply to comment by poiyurt in [WP] The knight who saved the princess was a 40 year old man with a wife and kids. He doesn't want her hand he just thinks teenage girls shouldn't be held captive in towers in the middle of nowhere. by Gregamonster
Clearly not since we don't know if the 'daughters' are actually the girls they saved. And if it is, why haven't they returned to their families?