Ahh okay, then I understand why you did it. But still maybe it would be better to say that there are many more languages or put an number to the "others" line because I don't think many people will read all the names anyway. Maybe a headline which states the diversity of the Indian people directly on the dataset would be helpful to add to the point you are trying to make. Thing I am trying to say is that there are better ways of getting your point across then having a mile long dataset which many people just glance over. Compact info with focus on the point you want to get across is way more attention receiving.

But like the first comment these are just my two cents to it.

No front but this is ugly data.

Like first of all pls go with the highest one on top instead of these irrelevant ones that are way less important. People look at the top first and therefore should there be the most important things/biggest data points.

Second, this is way to much data, you don't need to list every single thing, at some point it's fine to put everything to "others" if it adds nothing to the data provided. Like at minimum after 0.01 no one cares about every single language anymore, maybe even earlier.

Would look way smoother if it wouldn't be such a long drawn out list.

Hope you perceive this as positive criticism to help you get your data ordered better and not as random hate.