AshFraxinusEps
AshFraxinusEps t1_j6movii wrote
Reply to comment by DjShoryukenZ in ELI5: Why do so many fruits have seedless varieties but the apple and cherry do not? by JanaCinnamon
Not sure who you were replying to, but I never mentioned apples :-P
AshFraxinusEps t1_j6moq6m wrote
Reply to comment by Redshift2k5 in ELI5: Why do so many fruits have seedless varieties but the apple and cherry do not? by JanaCinnamon
> good luck planting every seed from every archeological site in the Roman empire to see which is silphium
This is more the problem. But could be worth it, bearing in mind how historically important it was. We may have modern equivalents, but I bet that the medicinal value in modern times would be quite high too tbh
AshFraxinusEps t1_j6mm18r wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: Why do so many fruits have seedless varieties but the apple and cherry do not? by JanaCinnamon
Doubt that. Most/all natural plants have seeds and to my knowledge this one was just a default herb-like plant, so should have some seeds
Also the fact that it was cultivated suggests that it had a normal plant lifecycle. We can make seedless fruits but not so much for herbs and such
AshFraxinusEps t1_j6mlnfx wrote
Reply to comment by ShalmaneserIII in ELI5: Why do so many fruits have seedless varieties but the apple and cherry do not? by JanaCinnamon
Don't we know some major islands which were giant farms for the stuff? And maybe the plant is valuable enough to fund the digs to find the seeds
AshFraxinusEps t1_j6kyrq0 wrote
Reply to comment by Truth-or-Peace in ELI5: Why do so many fruits have seedless varieties but the apple and cherry do not? by JanaCinnamon
> it went the way of the
>
>silphium
I've been thinking about this recently. I doubt it is fully extinct? Surely we could excavate and try to find a seed? This was a common plant all over the med, so why would it be completely gone without a single surviving seed?
AshFraxinusEps t1_j1a9xil wrote
Reply to comment by serpentjaguar in Discovery of 1,000 previously unknown Maya settlements challenges the old notion of sparse early human occupation in northern Guatemala (ca. 1000 B.C.–A.D. 150) by marketrent
True, but they are grouped together in the pre-colombian era, like the Med is for all 0AD info outside of China/East, or like Medieval tends to mean Europe not Africa or Asia
AshFraxinusEps t1_j1a7ak1 wrote
Reply to comment by averytolar in Discovery of 1,000 previously unknown Maya settlements challenges the old notion of sparse early human occupation in northern Guatemala (ca. 1000 B.C.–A.D. 150) by marketrent
*Whispers. I'm tapping out. My knowledge isn't enough
But I did hear that maybe Satellite X-Ray scanning has shown an even more ancient civilisation/Stonehenge-like religious place along the Amazon, which makes more sense as long river like the Nile. Might have been more a seasonal giant religious/trade gathering though
BUT, I'll trust you. Maybe Guatemala would have been the Silk Road/Constantinople analogue between North and South America, like Constantinople/Istanbul/Byzantium was for the other giant continent
AshFraxinusEps t1_j19llj2 wrote
Reply to comment by Lord0fHats in Discovery of 1,000 previously unknown Maya settlements challenges the old notion of sparse early human occupation in northern Guatemala (ca. 1000 B.C.–A.D. 150) by marketrent
>Hansen has been arguing the need for increased archeology in this region for nearly 20 years
Let's be honest we should do that for more of the world in general. But yep, the South American civilisations haven't nearly been chronicled enough
AshFraxinusEps t1_j6mznsg wrote
Reply to comment by johnn48 in ELI5: Why do so many fruits have seedless varieties but the apple and cherry do not? by JanaCinnamon
Interesting, and cheers. I did think we'd eventually rediscover it, as it was too widespread to be completely gone (although those are famous last words of conservationists throughout history)
From your points, while the link says it is slow growing, only .1 really would excuse it going completely extinct, as if it reproduced by asexual budding then any buds in the soil would have long-since died. But from the link, it does seem seed-based and therefore it'd be odd to be completely extinct