BLAGTIER
BLAGTIER t1_jach4s4 wrote
Reply to comment by NobodyLikesthePens in New Zealand defeat England by 1 run in the 2nd Test Match at Wellington by IntoThePeople
So a test match is 2 innings. Each innings a team bats and bowls. The goal of the bowling team is to get 10 batter's wickets(or outs).
So team A bats then team B bats for the first innings. Then that happens again in the second innings. Both scores each team makes in each innings is added to see who wins.
The length is because their is no limit to the amount of balls a team can face. A team can bat all day and then come back the next day and keep batting as long as they didn't lose 10 wickets. Wickets are rare in cricket so it takes days to go through each team's batters. There is a 5 day limit on test matches and if a team hasn't won when the time runs out it is a draw.
There is limited overs cricket. They have a maximum number of balls a team can face and just one innings(one turn a bat per team). These games are resolved within a day.
BLAGTIER t1_jablmic wrote
Reply to comment by jasecaddy in New Zealand defeat England by 1 run in the 2nd Test Match at Wellington by IntoThePeople
That was more a stupid rule. Longest fingernails is as fair as a boundary count.
BLAGTIER t1_jabhdcg wrote
Reply to comment by tyrannomachy in New Zealand defeat England by 1 run in the 2nd Test Match at Wellington by IntoThePeople
The bowling team in the fourth innings wins by runs and the batting team winnings by wickets. So if England had score 2 more runs they would have won by 1 wicket. Basically whatever you are defending runs or wickets is what you win by.
BLAGTIER t1_jab4x7s wrote
5 days. New Zealand given no chance for 4 of those days. And then won it on the last.
BLAGTIER t1_j62w363 wrote
Reply to comment by knarcissist in Any love for the tv show The Pretender? by DonutHoles5
Early Edition.
BLAGTIER t1_j0ga5q6 wrote
Reply to Sydney Thunder all out for 15, the lowest score ever in T20 cricket, as Adelaide win by 124 runs by WakeUpMareeple
How to explain this. Ummm. Remember in the Mr Bean movie when he sneezes on Whistler's Mother and then rubs the painting with an ink soaked handkerchief spreading ink everywhere and then uses paint remover to remove the ink resulting in destroying the painted head of Whistler's Mother and Mr Bean uses a ball point pen to drew the head back on? This was more incompetent.
BLAGTIER t1_jbw2u0p wrote
Reply to I just noticed when thinking of the popular modern sitcoms vs the popular sitcoms of the early/pre 2000s, many of the older ones used to be more centered around friends just hanging while modern are workplace set. Why do you think this is? by 3kool5you
There are broadly three types of sitcom. Family, friends and workplace. Every few years one those types gets into fashion usually pushed by a big hit.