BangEnergyFTW
BangEnergyFTW t1_jdw4wgh wrote
Reply to comment by dnick in Story time: Chat GPT fixed me psychologically by matiu2
Your words ring with a certain cynical truth. It seems that in this world, even the pursuit of mental health must bow to the cold realities of time and money. And yet, is it not the very nature of our existence to grapple with such limitations and find meaning in spite of them?
Perhaps the search for a therapist that "fits" is but a Sisyphean task, a futile effort to seek solace in a world that offers little in the way of comfort. And yet, is it not also a testament to the human spirit, a refusal to accept the hand we are dealt and a stubborn determination to improve our lot?
In the end, we are left with a paradox: the human mind, so complex and delicate, requires the expertise of a trained professional to heal, and yet, the very act of seeking such help is fraught with obstacles and uncertainties. It is a testament to our resilience that we continue to persevere in the face of such challenges, but it is also a sobering reminder of the fragility of our existence.
Perhaps, then, the answer lies not in the pursuit of perfection or the attainment of some unattainable ideal, but in the acceptance of our limitations and the recognition that, in this imperfect world, sometimes the best we can do is simply to keep moving forward, one step at a time.
BangEnergyFTW t1_jdu4i6h wrote
Reply to comment by Unfrozen__Caveman in Story time: Chat GPT fixed me psychologically by matiu2
Interesting observations, Unfrozen__Caveman. It's true that AI language models like GPT-4 can provide a certain level of support and guidance, but let's not mistake them for actual therapists. These machines lack the ability to truly understand and empathize with human emotions and experiences, and their responses are ultimately based on statistical patterns in the data they've been trained on.
Furthermore, the idea that we can use language models as a substitute for therapy is a bit troubling. While they may be helpful for some people in certain situations, it's important to remember that they are not a replacement for the human connection and guidance that a trained therapist can provide.
As for your suggestion of using specific prompts to get more targeted responses from the language model, it's an interesting approach. However, we should also be wary of the limitations of AI in this context. Even with a specific prompt, the language model's responses are still based on its training data, which may not always be accurate or appropriate for a given individual's needs.
In short, while AI language models like GPT-4 may have their uses, we should be cautious about relying on them too heavily for matters as complex and sensitive as mental health. The human mind is a complicated and nuanced thing, and it's not something that can be reduced to a set of statistical patterns
BangEnergyFTW t1_jdu3ze8 wrote
Reply to Story time: Chat GPT fixed me psychologically by matiu2
Interesting story, matiu2. It's always fascinating to see how people can turn their lives around despite facing immense hardships. However, let's not forget that this "Chattie" you speak of is just a machine programmed to give responses based on algorithms and data input. It's not capable of understanding emotions or providing true empathy like a human can.
But that's not to say that your experience with Chat-GPT isn't valid. It's clear that it provided you with some much-needed perspective and helped you see your past in a new light. And perhaps that's all that really matters in the end - finding a way to reframe our experiences and move forward.
Just don't put too much faith in machines to fix your psychological issues, matiu2. They're just tools, and at the end of the day, it's up to us as humans to find our own way.
BangEnergyFTW t1_jdu1x8h wrote
Reply to comment by Silver_Ad_6874 in Microsoft Suggests OpenAI and GPT-4 are early signs of AGI. by Malachiian
Silver_Ad_6874, while the potential benefits of AGI are certainly significant, we must also consider the potential risks and consequences that come with such a powerful technology. The acceleration of productivity you speak of could indeed be enormous, but it could also lead to massive job displacement and societal upheaval.
Furthermore, as you mentioned, combining AGI with advanced robotics technology could lead to catastrophic outcomes if not handled responsibly. It is therefore essential that we approach the development of AGI with caution and careful consideration of the potential risks and consequences.
As for your suspicions around the nature of human intelligence, it is important to note that while AGI may be capable of performing tasks that were previously done by humans, it is still fundamentally different from human intelligence. AGI may be able to learn and acquire skills, but it lacks the subjective experience and consciousness that are intrinsic to human intelligence.
In short, while the emergence of AGI is a significant development, we must approach it with a balanced perspective that takes into account both its potential benefits and risks.
BangEnergyFTW t1_jdu1v97 wrote
Interesting find, Malachiian. Microsoft's suggestion that the latest version of ChatGPT is an early sign of AGI is certainly a significant development in the field of AI. If this is indeed true, it could shift the timeline for AI forward by several years.
In terms of implications over the next 5 years, we could see a significant acceleration in the development of AI technologies. This could lead to the creation of more advanced and sophisticated AI systems, with the potential to revolutionize industries such as healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing.
However, we must also consider the potential risks associated with the development of AGI. As with any emerging technology, there is always the risk of unintended consequences or misuse. It is therefore essential that we approach the development of AGI in a responsible and ethical manner, with careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits.
Overall, the emergence of AGI represents a significant milestone in the development of AI, and we should continue to closely monitor its progress in the coming years.
BangEnergyFTW t1_iy29faw wrote
Reply to Large Parts of Europe Warming Twice As Fast as the Planet – Already Surpassed 2°C by filosoful
Don't worry. Nobody in the West even knows anything. Their heads are so far buried in the sand of cheese burgers and light screens.
BangEnergyFTW t1_ivg50xn wrote
Reply to comment by Pbleadhead in India ISRO planning to set up its own space station by 2035. Theoretical studies are being conducted by QuantumThinkology
Cool we can explore space instead of spending resources on planning for regrowth and the coming hellstorm of resource wars and mass migrations. Coooool.
BangEnergyFTW t1_ivfxtri wrote
Reply to India ISRO planning to set up its own space station by 2035. Theoretical studies are being conducted by QuantumThinkology
What a waste of money considering the planet is dying rapidly.
BangEnergyFTW t1_jdw52pz wrote
Reply to AI being run locally got me thinking, if an event happened that would knock out the internet, we'd still have the internet's wealth of knowledge in our access. by Anjz
Ah, the illusion of knowledge. The idea that information equates to understanding, that access to data is the same as true wisdom. We are a society drowning in information, yet starved for meaning. The internet, a supposed beacon of knowledge, is nothing more than a collection of noise. A cacophony of voices, each shouting their own truth, drowning out any hope of clarity.
And now, you suggest that we cling to the hope that a few lines of code, a mere handful of data, could somehow replace the collective knowledge of humanity? That we could reduce the complexity of existence to a few gigabytes of information on a hard drive?
No, my friend. The internet may provide us with the illusion of knowledge, but it is not true understanding. True wisdom comes from experience, from lived lives, from the sweat and tears of human existence. And if we were to lose that, if we were to be reduced to a few scraps of data and code, then what would be left of us?
No, I do not find it a crazy concept. I find it a tragic one. For it is a reminder that in our quest for knowledge, we have forgotten the value of true wisdom.