Not sure how you can call this data. The isometric view coupled with the placement of the meter makes the information impossible to retrieve.

Guess you’re new here.

It’s categorically worse. Instead of doing both, it’a poorly attempting and failing to do one.

For RT critics there is no difference between 9 critics scoring 100 and 1 scoring 49, and 9 critics scoring 51 with 1 scoring 49.

You are not equally likely to enjoy both of these films.

Telling what % of critics gave positive review is worse under every metric than simply averaging the scores my man. Outliers count for more under their system.

It asks critics: “Tell me with a score of 0 or 1, how good was this movie?”

For RT critics there is no difference between 9 critics scoring 100 and 1 scoring 49, and 9 critics scoring 51 with 1 scoring 49.

So fuck off. The system’s terrible.

My man, if rounding to the nearest hundred in a metric where 100 is the maximum score doesn’t already sound terrible to you, I won’t be able to explain it.

Sounds like a preposterously bad system

I thought Shang-Chi had an incredible first 45 mins-hour, then they shoulda rolled credits

If you trade Eternals and Captain Marvel, I'm actually very aligned with the critics on this one

As it deserves

This is a comparative scale, right? Seems to always be someone at 1.0 for each metric

….that’s not how being rich works.

Difference is, the US has fridges and freezers. They do a lot to preserve food until consumption

Why are they pumping it now? The US’s take on oil production has been to let others burn their reserves first while keeping ours for a rainy day

You’re right. It was objectively bad before I disliked it.

Give me one good reason why this data is animated instead of side by side 🤦🏻

Hush now, at least you’re on the map

How familiar are you with The Witcher source material? Because the article’s author missed a lot.

its*

FTFY

Thanks

My good friend passed away last night. His wife was with him. He won’t be there when she goes.

Sounds like you apply that label to most people.

I actually self-identify as a heathen, but I only moonlight as a troll.

I responded directly to the content of your comment. You are trying to apply something to one side of the conversation while ignoring what would happen if it were applied to both sides equally.

This convo is going nowhere, but only because you are stopping it.

PoE: There is an extraordinary amount of evil and suffering in the world. How can that fact be reconciled with the existence of a benevolent, omnipotent deity?

OP: We don’t know the reason there is evil, but we can assume it is necessary. You must prove it isn’t necessary or I’m right.

See how that works?

Oh boy.