BloodshotPizzaBox
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_jctm11i wrote
Reply to Why have many plants evolved to need nitrogen-rich soil, when there is so much nitrogen freely available in they air they use anyway? by runningchild
I assume that a big factor here is that the nitrogen in the air isn't "freely available" in the same sense that it is in nitrates in the soil. It's stuck to other nitrogen atoms, and N2 has a huge bond energy compared to the nitrogen-hydrogen bond in stuff like ammonium ions.(To digress, the fact that nitrogen atoms so desperately wants to bond with other nitrogen atoms is what makes nitrates so reactive in things like explosives. The formation of N2 releasing a lot of energy is the flip side of breaking N2 requiring a lot of energy.)
As to the reason why plants need nitrogen (the element as opposed to the gas) in the first place: it's a major component of chlorophyll. I mean, probably other reasons, but definitely that one.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_jclnk7v wrote
Reply to comment by papad622 in If UV radiation is used to disinfect and sterilise things then why isn't everything the sun touches (your skin, the sidewalk etc) sterile? by Critwhoris
Well, over 3 million people die each year from waterborne pathogens. I can assure you that germs are the much bigger problem to have here.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_jci5svo wrote
Reply to comment by viscence in Energy can not dissappear or be created, only change form, right? Earth is blasted by the sun 24/7, where does the excess energy go, because I guess it doesn't stay here or we'd cook by mr_greenmash
Just to add: the thing you want to google to learn more about this is "black body radiation" or "thermal radiation."
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_jardv0o wrote
Reply to If cancer is caused by mutations in genes that regulate normal cell development/division, how does killing cancer cells prevent it from coming back? by [deleted]
You seem to be thinking of "the genetic mutation" as something separate from the cancerous cells. It's not.
That is, the genetic mutation that causes cancer isn't something that's expressed in your whole body that makes cancerous cells, it's something that happens in one cell that then divides uncontrollably (if the immune system doesn't eliminate is as foreign soon enough).
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_j9z5sjz wrote
The ride appears to shake its car around using hydraulic arms. So it's speeding up and slowing down all the time, changing the speed and direction (remember that velocity and therefore acceleration includes both) of the car's motion.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_j7h8kq6 wrote
Reply to comment by foodtower in Do tonal language speakers understand each other while whispering? by Paulix_05
I realize "Sue" and "zoo" with slightly different tongue placement (the "s" is just a bit more fronted), which might or might not be distinguishable to a listener. I'd be more convinced if I tested it on someone who had to guess which one I meant without me telling them which I intended, and absent any surrounding context.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_j3y40cp wrote
Reply to comment by poorbill in Why do poultry producers kill their stock when they get bird flu, rather than keeping survivors to reproduce? by poorbill
Selective breeding doesn't seem like a great strategy here in the first place, as viruses probably have a vastly shorter generation time (and hence a faster adaptation rate) than chickens.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_iyi8te9 wrote
Reply to Do we have any compounds or materials on Earth that compared to the rest of the universe is incredibly rare? by SwordArtOnlineIsGood
I know this isn't what you meant by the question, but since the vast majority of the universe (not counting dark matter, whatever that is) is made of stars that are mostly hydrogen and helium, basically everything on Earth is very rare compared to the universe in general. So, that's pretty cool.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_ixkgywo wrote
Reply to If freezing tissue generally damages the cells, how are we able to freeze human eggs and embryos for birthing later? by badblackguy
Largely, by introducing agents that inhibit the growth of ice crystals. Smaller ice crystals mean less cell damage.
In broad strokes, this is similar to some of the measures often used to keep your ice cream smooth and creamy instead of just being frozen cream cubes.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_ix1ce6i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How can foods cause cancer? by CanaryChemical8201
>Generally the only carcinogens in food come from the way we cook and or preserve the foods.
Not so. For example, fiddleheads naturally contain the carcinogen ptaquiloside.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_it4uo4i wrote
Reply to comment by RationalFragile in Is building dams a learned behaviour for beavers? by Snoo-82132
Swedish biologist Lars Wilsson found in the 1960s that beavers raised in isolation will show dam-building behavior in response to the sound of running water. This proved to be the case even in the absence of actual water, with sound played over a loudspeaker on a dry floor.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_isestgj wrote
There are many depth cues other than binocular parallax, so people with one eye can still judge depth, just not as well.
Examples of monocular depth cues include:
Relative size, or absolute size of familiar objects: the farther away something is, the smaller it appears, and this can be used to either compare similar objects that appear different sizes, or to judge the distance of an object whose size is familiar.
Texture gradient: basically, this is relative size applied to the fine detail of texture. Imagine a gravel road, for example; its apparent texture becomes finer the farther away you go.
Motion parallax: things moving at familiar speeds have slower apparent motion the farther away they are. Or, when you are moving, things farther away from you have slower apparent motion.
Overlap: closer objects obscure farther ones.
Elevation to the horizon: things farther away tend to be nearer the horizon.
Accommodation: Your eye changes shape via muscular action in order to focus on objects, and the shape depends on the distance to the object.
BloodshotPizzaBox t1_jdhwv4s wrote
Reply to Now that the appendix's usefulness has been discovered, isn't it dangerous to deliberately remove it? or try to heal him in another way. Does a person without an appendix have a permanently bad microbiota? by RetroStationGas
When the appendix gets surgically removed, it's typically because it's in the process of dying and trying to take the patient out with it. So its usefulness has already ended at that point.
There are cases of appendicitis that are treatable with antibiotics, but in general it tends to come on too quickly and severely for that.