BoatAccidentSurvivor
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j6jcqyj wrote
Reply to comment by pgm_01 in Saturday mornings forecasted low temperatures. -2 for Hartford. by Swede577
Yes. By the way, I’m gay.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j6ikyss wrote
I’ll be in Mexico. Enjoy.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j65hqt6 wrote
Reply to comment by Badgercakes7 in CT's legislature salaries are starvation wages, $28k/year. You have to be retired or rich to serve. This is regressive and should be changed. by MormonReformist
That’s a start. I could get down with that. And it would weed out some of the more casual and propagandized votes. You got my vote.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j64l2k3 wrote
Reply to comment by Badgercakes7 in CT's legislature salaries are starvation wages, $28k/year. You have to be retired or rich to serve. This is regressive and should be changed. by MormonReformist
How do you propose that we prevent already rich and powerful people from just collecting an extra 100K just for the hell of it? After all, a huge amount of your probability of winning a local election depends upon your ability to fund your candidacy, which is how we ended up with the oligarchical political class that we have.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j63uoq4 wrote
Reply to comment by Badgercakes7 in CT's legislature salaries are starvation wages, $28k/year. You have to be retired or rich to serve. This is regressive and should be changed. by MormonReformist
Ok. So the solution is high salaries for those who are used to stretching a dollar? They would never make any decisions to personally enrich themselves at the expense of their constituents.
Anyway, I think you can see that there isn’t a solution. We have pitifully few examples of people in government serving because it’s their civic duty. It just gets overlooked because people are on teams and they want their political team to win.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j63kbqu wrote
Reply to comment by Badgercakes7 in CT's legislature salaries are starvation wages, $28k/year. You have to be retired or rich to serve. This is regressive and should be changed. by MormonReformist
Oh because incentivizing poor people who need 28k to make divisions about running our lives is such a good idea? You know because broke people are sooooo good at operating successful businesses.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j6005u8 wrote
Reply to comment by microspora in CT's legislature salaries are starvation wages, $28k/year. You have to be retired or rich to serve. This is regressive and should be changed. by MormonReformist
Whatever. I don’t care. I would prefer we don’t have anyone who’s job it is to sit around and dream up new ways to control our lives. The problem with these stupid jobs isn’t even the salary. It’s the back door deals, the fact that these positions attracts megalomaniacs, the board positions and industry jobs that are likely guaranteed once they push favorable legislation for their corporate buddies.
The whole thing is a scam. I don’t care if they get paid.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j5zpnh1 wrote
Reply to CT's legislature salaries are starvation wages, $28k/year. You have to be retired or rich to serve. This is regressive and should be changed. by MormonReformist
Good. They deserve less. Should be volunteer.
BoatAccidentSurvivor t1_j8icyxo wrote
Reply to Moving to CT from FL: Advice please by caimseeker
You’re moving the wrong direction unless you enjoy authoritarian government.