Buc4415
Buc4415 t1_iyblvtx wrote
Reply to comment by glberns in At least 2 Pennsylvania counties fail to certify election results by deadline by BoggyRob
So is it the norm for people to be held without bail for trespassing, assault, vandalism, etc… even those without any priors? This seems like a new thing for dems who have been championing bail reform even for people with prior felonies.
Yea cool. You are attacking an argument I never made. Awesome. I literally never said “no one planned to overthrow the government”. While I did say 90% didn’t, and I didn’t verify that number, I feel fairly confident you can’t connect any sort of criminal conspiracy to 90% of the people who entered the building.
So let’s bring this back full circle now. Should people charged with simple theft, trespassing, vandalism be held without bail? Do you think it is a miscarriage of justice to hold those people without bail? If you want to say simply attacking government property/ government employees isn’t sedition, then cool. I look forward to you appealing to Merrill Garland that it’s a miscarriage of justice to hold those people without bail.
Buc4415 t1_iybgw61 wrote
Reply to comment by glberns in At least 2 Pennsylvania counties fail to certify election results by deadline by BoggyRob
You are having trouble staying focused. Crime isn’t measured in convictions, it’s measured in reports. If person X gets murdered, and the killer is never found, person x still got murdered. Lack of conviction doesn’t mean crime wasn’t committed. Lol. You can keep trying to play semantics but it’s a weak game.
Let’s examine another source shall we.
Let’s be real, that’s not your burden of proof. If it was, you would be vying for 90% of the people who entered the capitol on 1/6 to be freed or charged with trespassing. You don’t actually care about “proof that anyone tried to overthrow the government”. Lol The people who attacked the White House are on your side and the people who attacked the capitol aren’t so it’s different.
Buc4415 t1_iybd2sq wrote
Reply to comment by glberns in At least 2 Pennsylvania counties fail to certify election results by deadline by BoggyRob
You didn’t address anything I said at all. Lol. Convictions or lack there of don’t mean a crime hasn’t taken place.
Also, the first paragraph seems to have a part that is applicable
“destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof,”.
I’d imagine attacking the White House qualifies here…. Lol. You can try to explain this away though. I’m looking forward to “but actually this isn’t that bc trump was a fascist”
Buc4415 t1_iybb6tv wrote
Reply to comment by glberns in At least 2 Pennsylvania counties fail to certify election results by deadline by BoggyRob
So crimes only happen when there is a conviction? That’s weird. Crimes are always measured in reports and not in convictions because of legal maneuvering and just because the offender hasn’t been caught, doesn’t mean a crime hasn’t been committed.
Buc4415 t1_iyb4zy8 wrote
Reply to comment by glberns in At least 2 Pennsylvania counties fail to certify election results by deadline by BoggyRob
What do you call attacking the White House and forcing the president into an anti terrorism bunker?
I would argue they aren’t liberal, they are progressive/leftists though so yea, I can’t find a “liberal” who committed sedition.
Buc4415 t1_ithroma wrote
Reply to comment by xxdropdeadlexi in Car crashes into dirt bike, kills rider: Philly police by snuffy_tentpeg
They can’t chase motorcycles, dirt bikes, etc…. Because it’s more of a danger to the public if the biker hits someone fleeing (unless they have reasonable suspicion of a greater crime like murder, burglary, armed robbery).
The public needs to give cops the go ahead to pursue these people and accept that there will be unintended accidents as a result of enforcing the law or put up with the status quo….. gotta pick one…
Buc4415 t1_iycw0j9 wrote
Reply to comment by glberns in At least 2 Pennsylvania counties fail to certify election results by deadline by BoggyRob
How long did they spend in jail, without bail set? You keep moving the goal post here. They were held for months without bail being set. They were treated like violent repeat felons. I just find it weird the party of bail reform kept so many non violent offenders in jail without setting a bail amount for them for such a long time.
You are a shifty one but I’m gonna nail you down on this.