Oh yeah, they'll say the code is so optimised because 10 years and 4 versions of flight control 🤣

From my experience, it's all kids in video games unable to control themselves.

No ramifications for the parents letting them do it.

The government is taking a nuclear response to a problem that can't be fixed like that.

Parents need to take accountability and until they do, there will always be a kid who doesn't care how many bans he gets. A bully that's doing it out of boredom and someone has to take the result.

Maybe concept design but tryi g to make consistent scenes is going to be a bottleneck for a long time

Fuck mate, chris roberts wants to have a word

Completely irrelevant to you saying Elon Musk is American.

Not the fucking point!

My wife is from another country and got citizenship within 7 years, she's not suddenly the same national as me.

She works on military contracts.

That doesn't make him a US national.

I have citizenship for a country I've never been to, doesn't mean I'm a national from that country.

I don't disagree, but it's not simple when you are dependent on their energy.

You just have to google it.

First 17 years in pretoria, he just has US citizenship, that just means foreign national with US citizenship.

Ffs

Not built for Ukraine. What's your point?

Elon is South African.

What?

USA yes, Elon musk? No.

Wtf are you talking about.

Go here:

source

Not even going through all countries but that alone is 16bn.

Musk is just sending some satellites over and black mailed them for money when he started being a dick

Wha????

Do you think Poland hasn't taken refugees? Provided training? Supplies in food and munitions?

And that's just Poland. Musk gives them some satellites, pulls them off on a whim, tells them to surrender and you think he's done more than the EU?

So you would press a button that wpuld give you 1 million but kill 1 person, but you think david beckham getting 150 million to say some words is terrible?

"That said no idea if it was 1 hit or 100," this tells you I am referencing the headline and not the article, didn't read it.

I can comment on the headline without reading the article, because the op if this threading said it was an odd phrasing of the heading.

Not upset, sticks and stones, just don't see why someone has to go john wick because I stated the headline doesn't state if it's 1 hit or 100, whether I read the article or not, I'm factually correct.

Hot take, I said from the title you can't say if it's 1 hit or 100.

Keep making drama.

I do appreciate scooby doo, but no

I said I didn't know if it was 1 hit or 100, all that needs to be said is "it's in the article" and that's it, someone name-calling is immature.

Defending name-calling is worse.

It's one thing to inform someone, another to be abusive, and another to defend it.

But then this is reddit.

This entire sub-thread is about the inaccuracy of the heading dipshit.

You turn an off-the-cuff remark into some major drama.

Move on

The first sentence was right. The rest of it was pretty ott

Or we could just not use the service