Cash_for_Johnny
Cash_for_Johnny t1_iutcyrt wrote
Reply to For those worried about the PA Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, it may be of some relief to you that this year’s ballot envelope is VERY unambiguous. While I personally find the ruling utterly preposterous I’d also say that the ballot itself is competently designed to compensate for it. by Trapezoidoid
My father last year put his Birthdate in that spot. Luckily my mother saw he did it wrong and they "corrected" it, but would a correction invalidate it? Like it might be deemed suspicious.
Cash_for_Johnny t1_iutrpnz wrote
Reply to comment by Illustrious_Air_1438 in For those worried about the PA Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, it may be of some relief to you that this year’s ballot envelope is VERY unambiguous. While I personally find the ruling utterly preposterous I’d also say that the ballot itself is competently designed to compensate for it. by Trapezoidoid
If it doesn't matter, then why all the hub-bub then.
It apparently matters to someone who wants to discount votes that are not in "their" favor, and in turn complain about voting integrity.
And you need to be talking in past tense because with new rules and restrictions on the books the future of assumptions is wide open.