Charisma_Modifier

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jacgce2 wrote

Sandrews1313 is on a crusade to comment all over this post haha, yikes. Sorry to have bothered you to the point you spent your morning doing that. Weird way to spend one's time but....you do you.

0

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jac95o5 wrote

Yeah I'm not a science expert either, I thought that was the point of shower thoughts, but oh well.

I agree that your theory makes sense. And my 17% is based off of max age (oldest human was 125) which is why I compared to max age of deer (even though it's rare deer make it to 17 in wild) for some continuity.

1

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jac8w6a wrote

Average of all Olympians is 27, but there are a lot of events that are easier for older athletes to be competitive at. Gymnasts are typical much younger than 27, swimmers are younger. I wasn't just talking to strength, which is why is worded it as performance/potential (maybe I should have worded it more clearly). And it's not just Olympics, look at something like MotoGP, very mentally and physically demanding, needs high reaction time...they are considered OLD when entering mid 20s. I'm not claiming to be a scientific expert in this, it was a shower thought. But I appreciate your input though.

−2

Charisma_Modifier OP t1_jac7t8u wrote

−1