CitationNeededBadly

CitationNeededBadly t1_jebfenj wrote

Your article states that 5 of the 7 on the board of directors were appointed by the governor, not the legislature. The MBTA board of directors web page also says this. https://www.mbta.com/leadership/mbta-board-directors

The other 2 are the secretary of transportation, and one chosen by the cities and towns in the MBTA advisory board.

1

CitationNeededBadly t1_jdx2ac1 wrote

Is there hopefully some limits on what the Initial Board is allowed to do? This sounds like a really bad agreement for you and the other buyers. If I read this a buyer I'd be scared. Is this a normal agreement for new developments? I'm in an already established building so I'm not sure. In our setup, a simple 51% majority can spend money that's already in the condo account, but it takes 75% to make an assessment (raise the monthly rates or do a one time charge to all units)

2

CitationNeededBadly t1_j9ux06i wrote

So, they got 100 million to fix slow zones. They spent 1 million to collect and analyze data for internal purposes, like what they should fix first. They spent another 100k to make that data accessible to the public. I don't see the problem. * these are made up numbers but the orders of magnitude are the point - fixing the slow zones is gonna cost waaaaay more than just making a dashboard, and collecting the data in the first place as already necessary as a prerequisite for actually fixing stuff.

5