That assumption that independence = #1 is fraught with assumptions on the needs of the world market. The likelihood that the US can produce the best chips is high. The likelihood it can produce the cheapest/most numerous chips is low. One of those is worth prioritizing, the other is probably not worth the effort, even if it is possible. I'll put my money on impossible given the Chinese are much better at reducing costs.
Not sure what prompted that little rant at the end. I never once mentioned globalism, but alright👍
CobainPatocrator t1_jae7gb9 wrote
Reply to comment by S-192 in The U.S. needs more than the CHIPS Act to stay ahead of China: MIT report by Vailhem
That assumption that independence = #1 is fraught with assumptions on the needs of the world market. The likelihood that the US can produce the best chips is high. The likelihood it can produce the cheapest/most numerous chips is low. One of those is worth prioritizing, the other is probably not worth the effort, even if it is possible. I'll put my money on impossible given the Chinese are much better at reducing costs.
Not sure what prompted that little rant at the end. I never once mentioned globalism, but alright👍