CompetitiveYou2034
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_je8pgtb wrote
Reply to comment by duc4rm3 in Why are nonhuman erect bipedal animals so rare? by violetmammal4694
Horses have large heads, but do not have comparably large brains. They do have strong necks.
Humans around the globe are social pack hunters. Language skills help coordinate. Accident with hyoid bone placement in our neck helps us produce many diverse sounds.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j78jst4 wrote
Reply to comment by LightningRodofH8 in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
[Moot response, written after balloon is popped over the Atlantic ocean.]
> The balloon is carrying 1,000 lbs of equipment ....
The capture planes were cargo aircraft that carry many tons. 1,000 lbs would not be a problem, dragged by a wire behind a heavy lifter.
Unfortunately for today's events, those capture planes are in a bone graveyard or sold for scrap. Worse, the pilots trained in such maneuvers are long retired or gone.
If it was deemed needed, the Air Force could easily recreate the 1960s air skyhook capability.
My predictions are:
-- the Chinese will not be brazen enough to repeat the spy balloon anytime soon. Therefore. no need to recreate skyhook.
-- if they do send another, the US will shoot it down in Alaska or over the Pacific ocean as it enters US adiz.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j74pe90 wrote
Reply to comment by rootofallworlds in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
> .... Would {not} be reliable because the balloon does not have a designated grab point .....
Historical fact - well trained pilots made it work. Over 50 successful captures of film canisters ejected under a parachute. See KH8 Gambit
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j73wyop wrote
Reply to comment by paranoiamachine in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
The balloon part must be large, to reliably stay aloft for a ten thousand mile (?) voyage, and haul say 100 lbs (?) payload.
We only care about the spy payload, which might be quite small.
Very sure the US Air Force is closely examining this, and has a sense of it's actual size.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j73ois3 wrote
Puncture the balloon, let it descend slowly, capture it via a plane trailing extended hooks.
Recap: a historical feat of pilot derring do!
Before we had high speed digital communication with our spy satellites, before we had digital cameras with megapixel lenses ....
1960s - 1980s, US spy satellites took high resolution pictures on actual film.
When a film canister was complete, or had time urgent info, it was ejected under a parachute.
A specially modified plane was waiting, that trailed a long wire with a v-shape, or hooks, which snagged the parachute canopy.
The plane reeled in the wire. Picked up the canister, and flew to have the film processed.
Example: KH-8 Gambit 3 satellite.
Same thing can be done with Chinese spy balloon.
The Chinese payload is a bigger than a film canister, but the capture plane can still fly it's payload for a soft-ish landing, dropped from say 50 feet onto a fireman's jumper rescue inflated balloon.
Seems very fitting, capture a payload from a balloon, drop it onto another balloon.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j73mstz wrote
Important question regarding the Chinese spy balloon.
How does it report back info?
Surely it was not planned to store the info, and then continue round the world, or return flight over the Arctic or the Pacific Ocean!
We should physically capture it to determine it's communication method(s), encryption, etc.
If this was truly quote a civilian meteorological platform that went off course, the Chinese can have no complaint to our examining it.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j5o2b4c wrote
Reply to comment by Foe117 in Starlink Is ‘Forced’ To Finally Start Caring About The System’s Light Pollution And Harm To Scientific Research by Albion_Tourgee
If nothing else, momentarily passing in front of objects causes them to apparently blink, or at least lose a few photons..
Will have to take into account the starlink orbital locations database, identifying each starlink satellite with it's orbital parameters and masking version.
Ground based observations will become harder with increasing #s of starlink types in near orbit, from multiple countries.
SpaceX can gain good will by providing an "offset" by reduced launch costs to higher orbits of astronomical sensors.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j4z2kwl wrote
True, not enough for construction.
But we are way far from construction of a fusion power plant.
Two million $ helps support researchers to analyze results. To review the science and peer discuss.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j2fn8t2 wrote
Reply to comment by paskahuussi89 in Iran tests military drones in wargame near Strait of Hormuz by Beckles28nz
Repeat of lesson learned with Air Force interceptors in Vietnam, which were originally only equipped with air-to-air missiles. Then they faced Russian Migs in actual combat. Guns were added!
Moral: A true multi-role fighter must have a gun.
Future: A gun can fire a short burst at each drone. Very economical.
Add computer auto control and off-axis shooting, and the fighter can fly past a flock of drones, downing them all.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j2c5x1u wrote
Reply to comment by screaming_vultures in Sam Bankman-Fried Likely to Plead Not Guilty to Fraud Charges by habichuelacondulce
Past donations don't buy anything. They're, well, past.
Only the prospect of future donations counts. And I can't see any clients letting SBF control their money ever again.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j2c5f6p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Sam Bankman-Fried Likely to Plead Not Guilty to Fraud Charges by habichuelacondulce
There's still Fraud. They promised client assets would be placed in a vault. Instead allegedly they were used as collateral to purchase risky assets. If they won their bets, clients might never have known.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j22fs3t wrote
Reply to Ukrainian court passes first sentences under war crimes law against former Crimean security officials by sviterochec
Sentenced in absentia.
This conviction means nothing until they are captured.
Which raises the question, why blur the faces which makes them harder to recognize?
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_iu94yo7 wrote
Reply to comment by peretona in UK Local Councils forced to buy 40,000 mirrors to put in polling stations as a result of voter ID laws by peretona
When checking pictures on ID's, who looks at hair styles anyway? Women change their hair styles, length, color, etc. So a hair difference makes no difference!
Let people keep their hair covers on. Also, then you don't need mirrors.
Face coverings are different and crucial. Checking ID's we need to see the person's face.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_jed0c94 wrote
Reply to comment by roararoarus in Dmitry Muratov: Nuclear warning from Russia's Nobel-winning journalist by TheRealBunkerJohn
Russian history summary:. . And then it gets worse!