Consensuseur
Consensuseur t1_jaa7pys wrote
Reply to comment by Blu_Cloude in Magnetic pole reversal by Gopokes91
I don't mean this rudely...but do you even science much? Do you know any real scientists? Do you understand what motivates them? I don't understand how you can dismiss something so without more understanding of it. Scientists tend to be smart...like could've gone into finance or invented something profitable. But no, they gather and interpret data ... To find and explain correlations. Like if you had programming chops but taught coding at a high school instead of banking on your tech skills. It's more like that. Wind ,weather and tides are not magnetically driven. That's down to earths interaction with lunar gravity and incoming solar radiation, but not magnetism. IMO you might do well to reorient your axis of trust/suspicion so you don't get misinformed. Imagine how great it would be if the experts actually knew their stuff and you could believe them because they're obsessed with, above all, accuracy of information! Yes, tobacco and oil paid for bunk science and lied/ lie about their products harm but they're the exceptions. Astrophysicists aren't trying to fool you bro. The world is a better place than that. You can just Google:. "free access to scholarly journals/ articles"...many sources will be revealed.
Consensuseur t1_ja8dwxe wrote
Reply to comment by Actaeus86 in Universal ethics/basic law for all people & global moral education: A new way to sustainability and peace? by fortin1984
I would if it were just.
Consensuseur t1_ja06y2c wrote
Reply to comment by CegeRoles in The Job Market Apocalypse: We Must Democratize AI Now! by Otarih
You still can. "Social democracy" or "Democratic socialism" is ok with that. Problem is. 85/3,500,000,000 person equivalency of wealth. Not enough cash on the board for 8000000000 people to play the game.
Consensuseur t1_ja00fcp wrote
Reply to comment by Rayqson in The Job Market Apocalypse: We Must Democratize AI Now! by Otarih
Good post. well said, thank you!
Consensuseur t1_j9rz7q3 wrote
Of Montreal, Unknown Mortal Orchestra
Consensuseur t1_j7t2a6b wrote
Reply to comment by mhornberger in What's your estimation for the minimum size of global population required for preserving modern civilization with advanced technology and medicine, and even progressing further? by Evgeneey
Well, hopefully our population can plateau and our consumption can be achieved with less consequence sooner rather than later.
Consensuseur t1_j7t17bp wrote
Reply to comment by mhornberger in What's your estimation for the minimum size of global population required for preserving modern civilization with advanced technology and medicine, and even progressing further? by Evgeneey
I think this is right. I wish our economy was scored more on improvements in efficiency and less on limitless growth. Lower growth and consumption rates are at odds with our indexes of what we call economic health. How to untangle these things?
Consensuseur t1_j7rahap wrote
Reply to comment by Wipperwill1 in What's your estimation for the minimum size of global population required for preserving modern civilization with advanced technology and medicine, and even progressing further? by Evgeneey
I've heard of those. What are they again?
Consensuseur t1_j7q6gl7 wrote
Reply to comment by Wipperwill1 in What's your estimation for the minimum size of global population required for preserving modern civilization with advanced technology and medicine, and even progressing further? by Evgeneey
Yes, pretty much what's happening now.
Consensuseur t1_j7psus8 wrote
Reply to What's your estimation for the minimum size of global population required for preserving modern civilization with advanced technology and medicine, and even progressing further? by Evgeneey
You mean how many of us could the oligarchy kill off before it became an inconvenience to them?
Consensuseur t1_j6nrisa wrote
Reply to comment by time_drifter in Louisiana Swamps (OC) [3024x4032] by Dommdivaa
Had my canoe tipped over once by a goose who thought I was going to feed him so yeah, that's probably not a good thing to do with a gator.
Consensuseur t1_j6nqihp wrote
Reply to comment by shershah13 in Louisiana Swamps (OC) [3024x4032] by Dommdivaa
Imagine... youre a Spanish sailor. You see the land from your ship. grab a musket and a couple of guys on a skiff and head over to make land but it's just miles and miles and miles of endless primordial mangrove swamps, full of 32' (39' ?)Gators, cottonmouth, and flocks of birds. Now your miles into the glades and it's getting dark...
Consensuseur t1_j6np4as wrote
Reply to comment by Consensuseur in Louisiana Swamps (OC) [3024x4032] by Dommdivaa
Ok let's go with turtle.
Consensuseur t1_j6llcuq wrote
Reply to comment by Dommdivaa in Louisiana Swamps (OC) [3024x4032] by Dommdivaa
Or a monster!
Consensuseur t1_j6l6xvp wrote
Reply to Louisiana Swamps (OC) [3024x4032] by Dommdivaa
What the hell is that in the foreground?
Consensuseur t1_j4ufgji wrote
Reply to What are the most important/influential texts you've read that have informed how you think about the future? by santgun
Buckminster Fuller: Utopia or Oblivion, Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth
Consensuseur t1_j1x75ep wrote
Reply to WE6574 Interior, Me, Digital, 2022 by veryveig
Fly on with your bad self!
Consensuseur t1_jaa8zye wrote
Reply to comment by Gopokes91 in Magnetic pole reversal by Gopokes91
Thou art pardoned! Go forth and observe.