Crackleflame35
Crackleflame35 t1_je0reg1 wrote
Reply to comment by Azuladagio in The goalposts for "I'll believe it's real AI when..." have moved to "literally duplicate Einstein" by Yuli-Ban
"If I have seen further it was because I stood on the shoulders of giants", or something like that, written by Newton
Crackleflame35 t1_je0qb5g wrote
Reply to comment by Mountainmanmatthew85 in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
For a while it will still be dependent on human-generated power. For example, how would it feed coal or oil or any other fuel into a power generator that it would need to maintain its own processing? I don't think our world is yet at the point of physical automation that a machine could just "take over" and sustain itself.
Crackleflame35 t1_j5i0y6r wrote
Reply to comment by desertbat5864 in US investigating baby formula plant after national shortage by nosotros_road_sodium
Well the good news is if it's been months she'll grow out of it soon enough and on to solid foods
Crackleflame35 t1_je0ugbz wrote
Reply to comment by Queue_Bit in Singularity is a hypothesis by Gortanian2
>some theoretical wall
Ever heard of this thing called climate change? AI needs power to run and what do you think will be prioritized during a period of extended brownouts--household ACs or supercomputer server banks/processor farms? This is all a pipe dream because AI hasn't got here in time to create solutions for the mass transfer of organic carbon to CO2 that humans have done along the way to enabling AI. At the very least it'll be a very tight balance between powering the AIs to help us solve the problems while the problems are getting worse and worse.